Suppr超能文献

用于检测麻痹性贝类中毒毒素的受体结合试验:与小鼠生物测定法的比较及在监管用途下的适用性

Receptor binding assay for the detection of paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins: comparison to the mouse bioassay and applicability under regulatory use.

作者信息

Ruberu Shiyamalie R, Langlois Gregg W, Masuda Melisa, Kittredge Clive, Perera S Kusum, Kudela Raphael M

机构信息

a Drinking Water and Radiation Laboratory Branch and Environmental Management Branch , California Department of Public Health , Richmond , CA , USA.

b Ocean Sciences Department , University of California Santa Cruz , Santa Cruz , CA , USA.

出版信息

Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2018 Jan;35(1):144-158. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2017.1369584. Epub 2017 Sep 8.

Abstract

The receptor-binding assay (RBA) method for the detection of paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) toxins was evaluated for its overall performance in comparison with the mouse bioassay (MBA). An initial study to evaluate the effects of filtering shellfish extracts prior to running the RBA indicated no significant difference between filtered and unfiltered extracts on the determined saxitoxin (STX) concentrations. Next, we tested the RBA assay on 295 naturally contaminated mussel tissue samples, ranging in concentrations from 320 µg STX equiv. kg to 13,000 µg STX equiv. kg by MBA. An overall trend was observed with the RBA giving higher results (256 µg STX equiv. kg on average) than the MBA; however, at low concentrations (< 500 µg STX equiv. kg) the RBA results were marginally lower. A third study was conducted using spiked mussel tissue analysed by three independent laboratories, two of which performed the RBA and one the MBA. This multi-laboratory study again showed the RBA to give higher results than the MBA; however, it also revealed that STX determination was accurate by the RBA, unlike the MBA. To optimise the assay for efficient usage under regulatory practice, three suggestions have been made: the use of an initial screening plate to separate those samples that exceed the alert level; use of rapid PSP test kits in the field and in the laboratory for screening negative samples and for early detection of toxicity; and use of an alternate commercially available porcine membrane in place of the laboratory-prepared rat membrane homogenate. The large number of samples analysed and the diversity of the tests conducted in this study further support the RBA as an affordable rapid method for STX detection that is also free of the routine sacrifice of live animals.

摘要

我们对用于检测麻痹性贝类中毒(PSP)毒素的受体结合分析(RBA)方法与小鼠生物测定法(MBA)的整体性能进行了评估。一项初步研究评估了在进行RBA之前过滤贝类提取物的效果,结果表明过滤和未过滤的提取物在测定的石房蛤毒素(STX)浓度上没有显著差异。接下来,我们对295个自然污染的贻贝组织样本进行了RBA检测,通过MBA测定其浓度范围为320微克STX当量/千克至13,000微克STX当量/千克。观察到一个总体趋势,即RBA得出的结果(平均为256微克STX当量/千克)高于MBA;然而,在低浓度(<500微克STX当量/千克)时,RBA的结果略低。第三项研究使用了由三个独立实验室分析的加标贻贝组织,其中两个实验室进行RBA,一个实验室进行MBA。这项多实验室研究再次表明RBA得出的结果高于MBA;然而,它也揭示了与MBA不同,RBA对STX的测定是准确的。为了在监管实践中优化该分析方法以提高使用效率,提出了三点建议:使用初始筛选板来区分那些超过警戒水平的样本;在现场和实验室使用快速PSP检测试剂盒来筛选阴性样本并早期检测毒性;使用另一种市售的猪膜代替实验室制备的大鼠膜匀浆。本研究中分析的大量样本和进行的多种测试进一步支持RBA作为一种经济实惠的快速检测STX的方法,该方法也无需常规牺牲活体动物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验