• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理困扰的稳定性与变化及其与自尊和控制点的关系:一个动态平衡模型。

Stability and change in psychological distress and their relationship with self-esteem and locus of control: a dynamic equilibrium model.

作者信息

Ormel J, Schaufeli W B

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Feb;60(2):288-99. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.60.2.288.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.60.2.288
PMID:2016670
Abstract

The proposed model assumes (a) that each person has a stable and characteristic symptom level, (b) that external events act to deflect symptom levels from this stable level, and (c) that adaptive mechanisms tend to normalize these deviations. The model is used to examine (a) the dynamics of psychological distress (PD), (b) the role of personality traits (i.e., self-esteem and locus of control), and (c) the contamination of these traits by the current level of PD. The analyses show that the structural model adequately fits data of 2 longitudinal community studies. Two thirds of the variance in distress could be attributed to differences in stable symptom levels, leaving 1/3 for environmental change agents. Both personality traits were substantially contaminated by PD levels. Finally, high symptom levels were strongly related to low self-esteem and external control. The applications of the model and the origins of stability and change in PD are discussed.

摘要

所提出的模型假定

(a)每个人都有一个稳定且独特的症状水平;(b)外部事件会使症状水平偏离这个稳定水平;(c)适应机制倾向于使这些偏差正常化。该模型用于检验:(a)心理困扰(PD)的动态变化;(b)人格特质(即自尊和控制点)的作用;(c)这些特质受当前PD水平的影响程度。分析表明,结构模型能够很好地拟合两项纵向社区研究的数据。三分之二的困扰差异可归因于稳定症状水平的差异,另外三分之一归因于环境变化因素。两种人格特质都受到PD水平的显著影响。最后,高症状水平与低自尊和外部控制密切相关。文中还讨论了该模型的应用以及PD稳定性和变化的根源。

相似文献

1
Stability and change in psychological distress and their relationship with self-esteem and locus of control: a dynamic equilibrium model.心理困扰的稳定性与变化及其与自尊和控制点的关系:一个动态平衡模型。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Feb;60(2):288-99. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.60.2.288.
2
Role of self-esteem in the relationship between stress and ingratiation.自尊在压力与逢迎关系中的作用。
Psychol Rep. 2011 Feb;108(1):239-51. doi: 10.2466/07.09.20.PR0.108.1.239-251.
3
Locus of control and self-esteem as moderators of stressor-symptom relations in children and adolescents.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1992 Aug;20(4):393-413. doi: 10.1007/BF00918984.
4
Social avoidance and distress as a predictor of perceived locus of control and level of self-esteem.社交回避与痛苦作为控制点认知和自尊水平的预测因素。
J Clin Psychol. 1982 Jul;38(3):611-3. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198207)38:3<611::aid-jclp2270380325>3.0.co;2-h.
5
Cognitive and emotional reactions to daily events: the effects of self-esteem and self-complexity.对日常事件的认知和情绪反应:自尊和自我复杂性的影响。
J Pers. 1991 Sep;59(3):473-505. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00257.x.
6
Stability and change of personality traits, self-esteem, and well-being: Introducing the meta-analytic stability and change model of retest correlations.人格特质、自尊和幸福感的稳定性与变化:引入重测相关的元分析稳定性与变化模型。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 May;110(5):766-81. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000066. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
7
High self-esteem, hardiness and affective stability are associated with higher basal pituitary-adrenal hormone levels.高自尊、心理韧性和情感稳定性与较高的基础垂体 - 肾上腺激素水平相关。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1995;20(6):591-601. doi: 10.1016/0306-4530(95)00005-9.
8
Personality as modifier of the life change-distress relationship. A longitudinal modelling approach.人格作为生活变化与痛苦关系的调节因素:一种纵向建模方法。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1989 Jul;24(4):187-95. doi: 10.1007/BF02351820.
9
Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct?自尊、神经质、控制点和一般自我效能感的测量指标是一个共同核心结构的指标吗?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Sep;83(3):693-710. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.83.3.693.
10
Self-esteem, locus of control, hippocampal volume, and cortisol regulation in young and old adulthood.青年和成年期的自尊、控制点、海马体体积与皮质醇调节
Neuroimage. 2005 Dec;28(4):815-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.014. Epub 2005 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The mental health of fly-in fly-out workers before and during COVID-19: a comparison study.新冠疫情前后飞行作业工人的心理健康:一项对比研究。
Aust J Psychol. 2023 Feb 19;75(1):2170280. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2023.2170280. eCollection 2023.
2
(In)effectiveness of Frame-Inducing Rating Instructions in State-Trait Research.框架诱导评分指导语在状态-特质研究中的(无)效性
Stress Health. 2025 Apr;41(2):e70021. doi: 10.1002/smi.70021.
3
Burnout among general practitioners, a systematic quantitative review of the literature on determinants of burnout and their ecological value.
全科医生职业倦怠:关于职业倦怠决定因素及其生态价值的文献系统定量综述
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 15;13:1064889. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1064889. eCollection 2022.
4
Influence of Intellectual-cultural Orientation as Family Culture on Chinese College Students' Subjective Well-being: A Moderation Model.智力文化取向作为家庭文化对中国大学生主观幸福感的影响:一个调节模型。
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221103924. doi: 10.1177/00469580221103924.
5
A descriptive systematic review of the relationship between personality traits and quality of life of women with non-metastatic breast cancer.非转移性乳腺癌女性人格特质与生活质量关系的描述性系统评价。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Apr 19;22(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09408-4.
6
Well-being of Polish university students after the first year of the coronavirus pandemic: The role of core self-evaluations, social support and fear of COVID-19.波兰大学生在冠状病毒大流行的第一年之后的幸福感:核心自我评价、社会支持和对 COVID-19 的恐惧的作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 16;16(11):e0259296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259296. eCollection 2021.
7
How inclusive leadership paves way for psychological well-being of employees during trauma and crisis: A three-wave longitudinal mediation study.包容性领导如何为员工在创伤和危机期间的心理健康铺平道路:一项三波纵向中介研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Feb;77(2):819-831. doi: 10.1111/jan.14637. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
8
How and When Does Inclusive Leadership Curb Psychological Distress During a Crisis? Evidence From the COVID-19 Outbreak.包容性领导如何以及何时能在危机期间抑制心理困扰?来自新冠疫情的证据。
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 6;11:1898. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01898. eCollection 2020.
9
Caring for the caregiver during COVID-19 outbreak: Does inclusive leadership improve psychological safety and curb psychological distress? A cross-sectional study.在 COVID-19 疫情期间照顾照顾者:包容性领导是否能提高心理安全感并遏制心理困扰?一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Oct;110:103725. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103725. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
10
Identifying long-term psychological distress from single measures: evidence from a nationally representative longitudinal survey of the Australian population.从单一测量指标识别长期心理困扰:来自澳大利亚全国代表性纵向调查的证据。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Mar 5;20(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00938-8.