School of Psychology, University of Ulster at Magee Campus, Co. Londonderry, BT48 7JL, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Addict Behav. 2010 Jun;35(6):586-92. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.01.014. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
Research suggests that diagnostic orphans (i.e., individuals experiencing only 1-2 criteria for DSM-IV alcohol dependence) may be at increased risk for developing more severe alcohol problems. This study aimed to: (i) investigate the course of diagnostic orphans in the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC), and (ii) explore whether a specific symptom endorsement pattern(s) could identify diagnostic orphans at Wave 1 who remitted or progressed to alcohol dependence at Wave 2.
Current drinkers (n = 15,751) were divided into diagnostic groups at Waves 1 and 2: no-alcohol use disorder (AUD); one-criterion orphans, two-criterion orphans, alcohol abuse, or alcohol dependence. Multinomial logistic regression analysis explored the association between diagnostic status at Wave 1 and Wave 2. Chi-square tests investigated differences in the criteria endorsement patterns of diagnostic orphans.
Compared to the no-AUD group, one-criterion orphans at Wave 1 were twice as likely to be in the abuse group and four times more likely to be dependent at Wave 2. Two-criterion orphans were three times more likely to be in the abuse group and eight times more likely to have progressed to dependence. Criterion endorsement patterns of diagnostic orphans at baseline did not significantly differentiate between those who remitted and those who progressed to dependence at follow-up.
Like previous research, diagnostic orphans are at increased for developing to more severe alcohol problems. Relying solely on the DSM-IV AUD diagnostic criteria, however, may not be sufficient to identify those diagnostic orphans who are at risk for progressing to dependence.
研究表明,仅符合 DSM-IV 酒精依赖诊断标准 1-2 项的个体(即诊断孤儿)可能有更高的风险发展出更严重的酒精问题。本研究旨在:(i)在国家酒精与相关状况流行病学调查(NESARC)中调查诊断孤儿的病程;(ii)探讨特定症状的出现模式是否可以在第 1 波识别出那些在第 2 波时缓解或进展为酒精依赖的诊断孤儿。
在第 1 波和第 2 波时,将当前饮酒者(n=15751)分为无酒精使用障碍(AUD)、单标准孤儿、双标准孤儿、酒精滥用或酒精依赖的诊断组。多分类逻辑回归分析探讨了第 1 波和第 2 波诊断状态之间的关联。卡方检验探讨了诊断孤儿标准出现模式的差异。
与无 AUD 组相比,第 1 波的单标准孤儿更有可能处于滥用组,而在第 2 波时,更有可能成为依赖者,其可能性是前者的四倍。双标准孤儿更有可能处于滥用组,而进展为依赖的可能性是前者的八倍。基线时诊断孤儿的标准出现模式并不能显著区分那些在随访时缓解和进展为依赖的个体。
与之前的研究一样,诊断孤儿更有可能发展为更严重的酒精问题。然而,仅仅依靠 DSM-IV AUD 诊断标准可能不足以识别那些有进展为依赖风险的诊断孤儿。