Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia and the Midwest Alcoholism Research Center, Columbia, Missouri 65211-0001, USA.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2010 Nov;71(6):864-9. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2010.71.864.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), currently uses a polythetic classification system for defining alcohol use disorders (AUD; alcohol abuse and dependence). This classification results in individuals who are subthreshold for an official AUD diagnosis but still endorse one or two criteria of dependence: so-called "diagnostic orphans." To our knowledge, however, there has been no attention given to diagnostic orphans from a lifetime perspective. The goal of the current article was to compare various diagnostic groups based on lifetime reports of abuse and dependence symptoms on a range of outcomes.
Data taken from the National Epidemiological Survey of Alcohol and Related Conditions study were used to form seven mutually exclusive diagnostic groups based on lifetime abuse and dependence symptomatology.
Diagnostic groups that experienced extensive dependence symptoms, regardless of past-12-month clustering (i.e., formal diagnostic criteria), tended to exhibit poorer outcomes compared with participants that met formal lifetime diagnosis for an AUD through abuse alone. It is notable that a significant group of individuals who failed to meet formal lifetime AUD diagnosis, but who endorsed a number of dependence symptoms, consistently demonstrated more problematic outcomes on a range of measures compared with individuals who never reported dependence symptoms but who were formally diagnosed with lifetime AUD through alcohol abuse.
DSM-IV lifetime diagnostic criteria may exclude individuals with a history of extensive dependence symptomatology. Implications regarding lifetime diagnosis conceptualization are discussed.
《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)目前采用多元分类系统来定义酒精使用障碍(AUD;酒精滥用和依赖)。这种分类导致一些个体虽然未达到 AUD 正式诊断标准,但仍符合依赖的一个或两个标准:即所谓的“诊断孤儿”。然而,据我们所知,从终身的角度来看,还没有人关注诊断孤儿。本文的目的是根据滥用和依赖症状的终身报告,比较各种诊断组在一系列结果上的差异。
本研究使用了来自全国酒精相关状况流行病学调查研究的数据,根据滥用和依赖症状的终身报告,形成了七个相互排斥的诊断组。
无论过去 12 个月是否有聚集(即正式的诊断标准),经历广泛依赖症状的诊断组往往比仅通过滥用符合正式终身 AUD 诊断的参与者表现出更差的结果。值得注意的是,有相当一部分不符合正式终身 AUD 诊断的个体,但存在一些依赖症状,与从未报告过依赖症状但通过酒精滥用正式诊断为终身 AUD 的个体相比,在一系列指标上表现出更严重的问题。
DSM-IV 终身诊断标准可能排除了有广泛依赖症状史的个体。讨论了关于终身诊断概念化的意义。