Suppr超能文献

串联质谱法碘海醇定量测量肾小球滤过率。

Iothalamate quantification by tandem mass spectrometry to measure glomerular filtration rate.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Clin Chem. 2010 Apr;56(4):568-74. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.133751. Epub 2010 Feb 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) can be determined by measuring renal clearance of the radiocontrast agent iothalamate. Current analytic methods for quantifying iothalamate concentrations in plasma and urine using liquid chromatography or capillary electrophoresis have limitations such as long analysis times and susceptibility to interferences. We developed a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to overcome these limitations.

METHODS

Urine and plasma samples were deproteinized using acetonitrile and centrifugation. The supernatant was diluted in water and analyzed by LC-MS/MS using a water:methanol gradient. We monitored 4 multiple reaction monitoring transitions: m/z 614.8-487.0, 614.8-456.0, 614.8-361.1, and 614.8-177.1. We compared the results to those obtained via our standard capillary electrophoresis (CE-UV) on samples from 53 patients undergoing clinical GFR testing.

RESULTS

Mean recovery was 90%-110% in both urine and plasma matrices. Imprecision was <or=15% for the m/z 614.8-487.0 and 614.8-456.0 transitions over a 10-day period at 1 mg/L. Method comparison for 159 patient samples (53 clearances) provided the following Passing-Bablok regressions: plasma iothalamate LC-MS/MS (y) vs CE-UV (x), y = 0.99x + 0.36; urine iothalamate LC-MS/MS vs CE-UV, y = 1.01x + 0.31; corrected GFR LC-MS/MS vs CE-UV, y = 1.00x + 0.00. Interfering substances prevented accurate iothalamate quantification by CE-UV in 2 patients, whereas these samples could be analyzed by LC-MS/MS.

CONCLUSIONS

Iothalamate can be quantified by LC-MS/MS for GFR measurement. This method circumvents potential problems with interfering substances that occasionally confound accurate GFR determinations.

摘要

背景

肾小球滤过率(GFR)可以通过测量放射性造影剂碘海醇在肾脏中的清除率来确定。目前,使用液相色谱或毛细管电泳定量检测血浆和尿液中碘海醇浓度的分析方法存在分析时间长和易受干扰等局限性。我们开发了一种液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)方法来克服这些局限性。

方法

尿液和血浆样品用乙腈和离心法进行蛋白沉淀。上清液用去离子水稀释,并用水-甲醇梯度通过 LC-MS/MS 进行分析。我们监测了 4 个多重反应监测转换:m/z 614.8-487.0、614.8-456.0、614.8-361.1 和 614.8-177.1。我们将结果与 53 名接受临床 GFR 检测的患者的样品通过我们的标准毛细管电泳(CE-UV)获得的结果进行了比较。

结果

尿液和血浆基质中的平均回收率为 90%-110%。在 10 天内,1mg/L 时,m/z 614.8-487.0 和 614.8-456.0 转换的精密度<或=15%。对 159 例患者样本(53 个清除率)的方法比较提供了以下通过 Bablok 回归:血浆碘海醇 LC-MS/MS(y)与 CE-UV(x),y = 0.99x + 0.36;尿液碘海醇 LC-MS/MS 与 CE-UV,y = 1.01x + 0.31;LC-MS/MS 校正的 GFR 与 CE-UV,y = 1.00x + 0.00。2 名患者的 CE-UV 因干扰物质而无法准确检测碘海醇,但这些样品可通过 LC-MS/MS 进行分析。

结论

可以通过 LC-MS/MS 定量检测碘海醇来测量 GFR。该方法规避了干扰物质偶尔会影响准确 GFR 测定的潜在问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验