Weibl Peter, Klingler Hans-Christoph, Klatte Tobias, Remzi Mesut
Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, AKH, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Wien, Austria.
Diagn Ther Endosc. 2010;2010:759431. doi: 10.1155/2010/759431. Epub 2010 Feb 14.
Laparo-Endoscopic Single-Site surgery (LESS) for kidney diseases is quickly evolving and has a tendency to expand the urological armory of surgical techniques. However, we should not be overwhelmed by the surgical skills only and weight it against the basic clinical and oncological principles when compared to standard laparoscopy. The initial goal is to define the ideal candidates and ideal centers for LESS in the future. Modification of basic instruments in laparoscopy presumably cannot result in better functional and oncological outcomes, especially when the optimal working space is limited with the same arm movements. Single port surgery is considered minimally invasive laparoscopy; on the other hand, when using additional ports, it is no more single port, but hybrid traditional laparoscopy. Whether LESS is a superior or equally technique compared to traditional laparoscopy has to be proven by future prospective randomized trials.
用于肾脏疾病的腹腔镜单孔手术(LESS)正在迅速发展,并且有扩大泌尿外科手术技术库的趋势。然而,我们不应仅仅被手术技巧所左右,在与标准腹腔镜手术相比时,不能忽视基本的临床和肿瘤学原则。最初的目标是确定未来LESS的理想候选者和理想中心。腹腔镜基本器械的改良大概不会带来更好的功能和肿瘤学结果,特别是当相同的手臂动作限制了最佳工作空间时。单孔手术被认为是微创腹腔镜手术;另一方面,当使用额外的端口时,它就不再是单孔手术,而是混合传统腹腔镜手术。与传统腹腔镜手术相比,LESS是否是一种更优越或同等的技术,必须通过未来的前瞻性随机试验来证明。