• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于iCHECK-DH指南和清单报告数字健康实施情况:交互式工具包的开发

Reporting Digital Health Implementations Based on the iCHECK-DH Guidelines and Checklist: Development of an Interactive Toolkit.

作者信息

Liyanage Anuradha, Irfaan Shakira, Moonesinghe Loshan, Kasturiaratchi Kaushalya, Perrin Franck Caroline, Hussein Rada

机构信息

Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Lindhofstraße 22, Salzburg, 5020, Austria, 43 05725582701.

Ministry of Health, Family Health Bureau, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 8;27:e74235. doi: 10.2196/74235.

DOI:10.2196/74235
PMID:40779756
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12334105/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite their potential, many digital health implementations fail to scale beyond pilot stages due to reporting challenges, stakeholder disengagement, and policy barriers. To improve documentation and knowledge sharing, the iCHECK-DH (Guidelines and Checklist for the Reporting on Digital Health Implementations) guidelines have been developed by global experts and implemented by the Journal of Medical Internet Research as the required reporting standard for implementation reports.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to introduce an interactive iCHECK-DH toolkit designed to streamline reporting, facilitate knowledge sharing, and support scalability, demonstrating its practical application through a use case.

METHODS

The iCHECK-DH toolkit was developed through an iterative process informed by best practices for creating user-friendly toolkits. A targeted literature review and analysis of World Health Organization documents were conducted to identify best practices in toolkit design. A multidisciplinary team designed the toolkit using the Fillout platform (Restly, Inc) for its intuitive interface. A total of 9 international experts in digital health and implementation science were recruited through purposive sampling. They provided qualitative feedback through semistructured interviews and open-ended comments on the draft toolkit. Discussions focused on content relevance, usability, and alignment with the iCHECK-DH framework. Feedback was thematically analyzed and key suggestions were incorporated iteratively into subsequent versions of the toolkit. It underwent pilot testing, with a real-world Family Planning Stock Management System in Sri Lanka serving as the use case. The findings further refined the toolkit's practicality and informed final improvements.

RESULTS

The interactive toolkit successfully translated the iCHECK-DH guidelines into a structured digital health implementations reporting tool, refining navigation, terminology, and usability based on qualitative feedback from the expert panel. It features 4 main sections, including a step-by-step checklist aligned with the 20 items of the iCHECK-DH framework, contextual explanations and examples for each item, a self-assessment function to track progress, and automatic compilation of a downloadable PDF report. Pilot testing showed that the toolkit enabled comprehensive documentation of all 9 domains and 20 checklist items from the iCHECK-DH framework. It confirmed its practicality and effectiveness, leading to targeted improvements. Time to complete the toolkit was 40 minutes (final version) after usability refinements.

CONCLUSIONS

The iCHECK-DH toolkit complements the iCHECK-DH guidelines, enhances their functionality, and demonstrates their usability through a practical use case. It provides a structured approach to digital health reporting, supporting scalability and knowledge sharing in real-world implementations.

摘要

背景

尽管具有潜力,但由于报告挑战、利益相关者参与度不足和政策障碍,许多数字健康实施方案未能超越试点阶段。为了改善文档记录和知识共享,全球专家制定了iCHECK-DH(数字健康实施方案报告指南和清单)指南,《医学互联网研究杂志》将其作为实施方案报告的必需报告标准予以实施。

目的

本研究旨在推出一个交互式iCHECK-DH工具包,旨在简化报告流程、促进知识共享并支持可扩展性,并通过一个用例展示其实际应用。

方法

iCHECK-DH工具包是通过一个迭代过程开发的,该过程参考了创建用户友好型工具包的最佳实践。进行了有针对性的文献综述和对世界卫生组织文件的分析,以确定工具包设计的最佳实践。一个多学科团队使用Fillout平台(Restly公司)设计了该工具包,因为其界面直观。通过目的抽样招募了9名数字健康和实施科学领域的国际专家。他们通过半结构化访谈和对工具包草案的开放式评论提供了定性反馈。讨论集中在内容相关性、可用性以及与iCHECK-DH框架的一致性上。对反馈进行了主题分析,并将关键建议迭代纳入工具包的后续版本。它进行了试点测试,以斯里兰卡的一个实际计划生育库存管理系统作为用例。研究结果进一步完善了工具包的实用性,并为最终改进提供了依据。

结果

交互式工具包成功地将iCHECK-DH指南转化为一个结构化的数字健康实施方案报告工具,根据专家小组的定性反馈改进了导航、术语和可用性。它有4个主要部分,包括与iCHECK-DH框架的20项内容一致的分步清单、每项内容的背景解释和示例、一个跟踪进展的自我评估功能以及自动生成可下载PDF报告。试点测试表明,该工具包能够全面记录iCHECK-DH框架中的所有9个领域和20个清单项目。它证实了其实用性和有效性,从而带来了有针对性的改进。在可用性改进后,完成工具包的时间为40分钟(最终版本)。

结论

iCHECK-DH工具包对iCHECK-DH指南起到了补充作用,增强了其功能,并通过一个实际用例展示了其可用性。它为数字健康报告提供了一种结构化方法,支持实际实施方案中的可扩展性和知识共享。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677b/12334105/5700d3460ffb/jmir-v27-e74235-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677b/12334105/133993a4f7da/jmir-v27-e74235-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677b/12334105/a724d53424f1/jmir-v27-e74235-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677b/12334105/d72f70446524/jmir-v27-e74235-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677b/12334105/b9fd525e30e2/jmir-v27-e74235-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677b/12334105/5700d3460ffb/jmir-v27-e74235-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677b/12334105/133993a4f7da/jmir-v27-e74235-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677b/12334105/a724d53424f1/jmir-v27-e74235-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677b/12334105/d72f70446524/jmir-v27-e74235-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677b/12334105/b9fd525e30e2/jmir-v27-e74235-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677b/12334105/5700d3460ffb/jmir-v27-e74235-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Reporting Digital Health Implementations Based on the iCHECK-DH Guidelines and Checklist: Development of an Interactive Toolkit.基于iCHECK-DH指南和清单报告数字健康实施情况:交互式工具包的开发
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 8;27:e74235. doi: 10.2196/74235.
2
A digital intervention to improve mental health and interpersonal resilience for young people who have experienced online sexual abuse: the i-Minds non-randomised feasibility clinical trial and nested qualitative study.一项针对遭受网络性虐待的年轻人改善心理健康和人际恢复力的数字干预措施:i-Minds非随机可行性临床试验及嵌套定性研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(28):1-27. doi: 10.3310/THAL8732.
3
Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.卫生技术评估中决策分析模型良好实践指南综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. doi: 10.3310/hta8360.
4
Five years of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in the development and evaluation of the Pain-at-Work toolkit to support employees' self-management of chronic pain at work.在工作场所慢性疼痛员工自我管理的疼痛工作工具包的开发和评估中,开展了五年的患者及公众参与和介入(PPIE)活动。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 15;11(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00757-5.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
7
Evaluating the Usability, Acceptability, User Experience, and Design of an Interactive Responsive Platform to Improve Perinatal Nurses' Stigmatizing Attitudes Toward Substance Use in Pregnancy: Mixed Methods Study.评估一个交互式响应平台的可用性、可接受性、用户体验及设计,以改善围产期护士对孕期药物使用的污名化态度:混合方法研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 May 8;12:e67685. doi: 10.2196/67685.
8
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
9
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
10
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
iCHECK-DH: Guidelines and Checklist for the Reporting on Digital Health Implementations.iCHECK-DH:数字健康实施报告的指南和清单。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 10;25:e46694. doi: 10.2196/46694.
2
"To Err Is Evolution": We Need the Implementation Report to Learn.“犯错乃进化之途”:我们需要执行报告来学习。
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Apr 4;11:e47695. doi: 10.2196/47695.
3
Making Digital Health "Solutions" Sustainable in Healthcare Systems: A Practitioner Perspective.让数字健康“解决方案”在医疗系统中可持续发展:从业者视角
Front Digit Health. 2022 Mar 31;4:727421. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.727421. eCollection 2022.
4
Deploying digital health tools within large, complex health systems: key considerations for adoption and implementation.在大型复杂卫生系统中部署数字健康工具:采用与实施的关键考量因素
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Jan 27;5(1):13. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00557-1.
5
A model for sustainable, partnership-based telehealth services in rural India: An early process evaluation from Tuver village, Gujarat.印度农村可持续的、基于伙伴关系的远程医疗服务模式:古吉拉特邦图维尔村的早期过程评估。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 13;17(1):e0261907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261907. eCollection 2022.
6
Cost-effectiveness of a Digital Health Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction Recovery.数字健康干预急性心肌梗死康复的成本效益。
Med Care. 2021 Nov 1;59(11):1023-1030. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001636.
7
Are we doing it right? We need to evaluate the current approaches for implementation of digital health systems.我们做得对吗?我们需要评估当前实施数字健康系统的方法。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Dec;45(6):778-781. doi: 10.1071/AH20289.
8
A tale of 'politics and stars aligning': analysing the sustainability of scaled up digital tools for front-line health workers in India.一个“政治与星辰交汇”的故事:分析印度为一线卫生工作者扩大数字工具的可持续性。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jul;6(Suppl 5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005041.
9
A user-centered chatbot to identify and interconnect individual, social and environmental risk factors related to overweight and obesity.一个以用户为中心的聊天机器人,用于识别和关联与超重和肥胖相关的个体、社会和环境风险因素。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2022 Jan 2;47(1):38-52. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2021.1923501. Epub 2021 May 25.
10
Development and use of a toolkit to facilitate implementation of an evidence-based intervention: a descriptive case study.促进循证干预措施实施的工具包的开发与应用:一项描述性案例研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Oct 6;1:86. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00081-x. eCollection 2020.