Shaw G A, Bekerian D A
Georgetown College, Kentucky.
Mem Cognit. 1991 Jan;19(1):87-94. doi: 10.3758/bf03198499.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether hypermnesia (improved net recall over time) can be differentially affected by manipulating the nature of tasks performed during the intervals between successive recall trials. In Experiment 1, all subjects were asked to imaginally encode separate words and were tested three times for recall. The control group (no interpolated task) produced the hypermnesia effect. Both groups performing interpolated tasks showed significantly lower recall. A second experiment was conducted in order to replicate these results and to examine the effects of intertest rehearsal on hypermnesia. In Experiment 2, subjects were asked to encode pairs of words using interactive-imagery instructions. Six different interpolated task conditions were employed, varying in the degree to which subsystems of working memory were used. Groups performing imaginal interpolated tasks showed no hypermnesia, whereas those performing nonimaginal tasks did. These findings suggest that access to working memory (see Baddeley, 1986) is not necessary for hypermnesia.
本研究的目的是确定超忆症(随着时间推移净回忆改善)是否会因操纵连续回忆试验间隔期间执行的任务性质而受到不同影响。在实验1中,要求所有受试者对单独的单词进行想象编码,并进行三次回忆测试。对照组(无插入任务)产生了超忆症效应。执行插入任务的两组受试者的回忆率均显著较低。进行了第二项实验以重复这些结果,并检验测试间复述对超忆症的影响。在实验2中,要求受试者使用交互式意象指令对单词对进行编码。采用了六种不同的插入任务条件,工作记忆子系统的使用程度各不相同。执行想象性插入任务的组未表现出超忆症,而执行非想象性任务的组则表现出超忆症。这些发现表明,超忆症并不需要访问工作记忆(见Baddeley,1986)。