Mulligan Neil W
Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75275-0442, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 May;28(3):541-54.
The generation effect is moderated by experimental design, affecting recall in within-subjects designs but typically not in between-subjects designs. However, N. W. Mulligan (2001) found that the generation effect emerged over repeated recall tests in a between-subjects design, calling into question the generality of this limiting condition. In addition, the generate condition but not the read condition produced hypermnesia (increased recall over tests). The present experiments demonstrate that semantic-based (semantic-associate and category-associate) generation tasks produce this pattern of results whereas nonsemantic (letter transposition, rhyme, word fragment) generation tasks do not. Thus, the emergent generation effect appears to be a byproduct of semantic elaboration rather than a direct product of generation. In addition, high- and low-imagery words produced equivalent hypermnesia and emergent generation effects, arguing against a mediating role for imagistic encoding. Finally, there is no evidence of an emergent generation effect for nonwords, another traditional limiting condition of the generation effect.
生成效应受实验设计的调节,在被试内设计中影响回忆,但在被试间设计中通常不影响。然而,N. W. 穆利根(2001年)发现,在被试间设计的重复回忆测试中出现了生成效应,这对这种限制条件的普遍性提出了质疑。此外,生成条件而非阅读条件产生了记忆增强(测试中回忆增加)。本实验表明,基于语义的(语义联想和类别联想)生成任务产生了这种结果模式,而非语义的(字母换位、押韵、单词片段)生成任务则不然。因此,出现的生成效应似乎是语义 elaboration 的副产品,而不是生成的直接产物。此外,高意象词和低意象词产生了同等的记忆增强和出现的生成效应,这与意象编码的中介作用相悖。最后,没有证据表明非词存在出现的生成效应,这是生成效应的另一个传统限制条件。