• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

容器系统在城市固体废物管理中的生命周期评价比较。

LCA comparison of container systems in municipal solid waste management.

机构信息

SosteniPrA (UAB-IRTA), Institute of Environmental Science and Technology (ICTA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2010 Jun;30(6):949-57. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.027. Epub 2010 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.027
PMID:20171078
Abstract

The planning and design of integrated municipal solid waste management (MSWM) systems requires accurate environmental impact evaluation of the systems and their components. This research assessed, quantified and compared the environmental impact of the first stage of the most used MSW container systems. The comparison was based on factors such as the volume of the containers, from small bins of 60-80l to containers of 2400l, and on the manufactured materials, steel and high-density polyethylene (HDPE). Also, some parameters such as frequency of collections, waste generation, filling percentage and waste container contents, were established to obtain comparable systems. The methodological framework of the analysis was the life cycle assessment (LCA), and the impact assessment method was based on CML 2 baseline 2000. Results indicated that, for the same volume, the collection systems that use HDPE waste containers had more of an impact than those using steel waste containers, in terms of abiotic depletion, global warming, ozone layer depletion, acidification, eutrophication, photochemical oxidation, human toxicity and terrestrial ecotoxicity. Besides, the collection systems using small HDPE bins (60l or 80l) had most impact while systems using big steel containers (2400l) had less impact. Subsequent sensitivity analysis about the parameters established demonstrated that they could change the ultimate environmental impact of each waste container collection system, but that the comparative relationship between systems was similar.

摘要

综合城市固体废物管理(MSWM)系统的规划和设计需要对系统及其组件进行准确的环境影响评估。本研究评估、量化和比较了最常用的 MSW 容器系统第一阶段的环境影响。比较的依据是容器的体积,从小型 60-80 升垃圾桶到 2400 升容器,以及制造材料,钢和高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)。此外,还确定了一些参数,如收集频率、垃圾产生量、填充率和废物容器内容物,以获得可比的系统。分析的方法论框架是生命周期评估(LCA),影响评估方法基于 CML 2 基线 2000。结果表明,对于相同的体积,使用 HDPE 废物容器的收集系统比使用钢废物容器的收集系统在非生物消耗、全球变暖、臭氧层消耗、酸化、富营养化、光化学氧化、人类毒性和陆地生态毒性方面的影响更大。此外,使用小型 HDPE 垃圾桶(60 升或 80 升)的收集系统影响最大,而使用大型钢容器(2400 升)的收集系统影响较小。对所确定参数的后续敏感性分析表明,它们可能会改变每个废物容器收集系统的最终环境影响,但系统之间的比较关系相似。

相似文献

1
LCA comparison of container systems in municipal solid waste management.容器系统在城市固体废物管理中的生命周期评价比较。
Waste Manag. 2010 Jun;30(6):949-57. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.027. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
2
Life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: a comparative analysis of selected peer-reviewed literature.城市固体废物管理系统的生命周期评估:对部分同行评审文献的比较分析
Environ Int. 2009 Nov;35(8):1256-66. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2009.07.009. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
3
LCA of selective waste collection systems in dense urban areas.密集城市地区选择性垃圾收集系统的生命周期评估
Waste Manag. 2009 Feb;29(2):903-14. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
4
Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey.土耳其埃斯基谢希尔固体废物管理方案的生命周期评估
Waste Manag. 2009 Jan;29(1):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.12.006. Epub 2008 Feb 15.
5
Environmental assessment of solid waste landfilling technologies by means of LCA-modeling.基于生命周期评估模型对固体废物填埋技术进行环境评估。
Waste Manag. 2009 Jan;29(1):32-43. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.021. Epub 2008 Apr 28.
6
The use of life cycle assessment for the comparison of biowaste composting at home and full scale.用生命周期评估比较家庭和规模化生物废物堆肥。
Waste Manag. 2010 Jun;30(6):983-94. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.023. Epub 2010 Mar 7.
7
Quantifying capital goods for collection and transport of waste.量化用于收集和运输废物的资本货物。
Waste Manag Res. 2012 Dec;30(12):1243-50. doi: 10.1177/0734242X12462279. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
8
Environmental assessment of alternative municipal solid waste management strategies. A Spanish case study.城市固体废物管理策略替代方案的环境评估。西班牙案例研究。
Waste Manag. 2010 Nov;30(11):2383-95. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.03.001. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
9
Environmental assessment of Ammässuo Landfill (Finland) by means of LCA-modelling (EASEWASTE).通过生命周期评估模型(EASEWASTE)对芬兰阿马苏奥垃圾填埋场进行环境评估。
Waste Manag Res. 2009 Aug;27(5):542-50. doi: 10.1177/0734242X08096976. Epub 2009 May 7.
10
Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management methods: Ankara case study.城市固体废物管理方法的生命周期评估:安卡拉案例研究
Environ Int. 2006 Apr;32(3):405-11. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2005.10.002. Epub 2005 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Looking beyond the banning of lightweight bags: analysing the role of plastic (and fuel) impacts in waste collection at a Portuguese city.超越轻便袋的禁令:分析葡萄牙城市垃圾收集过程中塑料(和燃料)影响的作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Dec;26(35):35629-35647. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05938-w. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
2
Life cycle analysis of management options for organic waste collected in an urban area.城市有机垃圾管理方案的生命周期分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Jan;22(1):248-63. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3330-9. Epub 2014 Jul 26.