Department of Urology and Medicine, University of California-Irvine, Orange, California, USA.
J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1464-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.009. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
After radical prostatectomy continence is commonly defined as no pads except a security pad or 0 to 1 pad. We evaluated the association of pad status and urinary quality of life to determine whether security and 1 pad status differ from pad-free status to better define 0 pads as the post-prostatectomy standard.
A total of 500 consecutive men underwent robot assisted radical prostatectomy from October 2003 to July 2007. Data were collected prospectively and entered into an electronic database. Postoperatively men completed self-administered validated questionnaires including questions on 1) daily pad use (0, security, 1, or 2 or more), 2) urine leakage (daily, about once weekly, less than once weekly or not at all), 3) urinary control (none, frequent dribbling, occasional dribbling or total control), 4) American Urological Association symptom score and 5) urinary quality of life.
Postoperatively men who indicated 0 pad use had a mean +/- SE symptom score of 5.8 +/- 0.3 and pleased quality of life (1.16 +/- 0.08). In contrast, men with a security pad and 1 pad had a symptom score of 7.6 +/- 0.7 and 9.2 +/- 0.6 but mixed quality of life (2.78 +/- 0.18 and 3.41 +/- 0.15, respectively, p <0.0005).
Results show a significant decrease in quality of life between no pads (1.16 or pleased), a security pad and 0 or 1 pad (2.78 and 3.41 or mixed, respectively). Findings do not support defining continence with a security pad or 0 to 1 pad. Continence should be strictly defined as 0 pads.
根治性前列腺切除术后,控尿通常定义为不使用尿垫,或仅使用一个安全尿垫或 0 至 1 个尿垫。我们评估了尿垫状态和尿控生活质量之间的关联,以确定安全尿垫和 1 个尿垫状态是否与无尿垫状态不同,以便更好地将 0 个尿垫定义为前列腺切除术后的标准。
共有 500 例连续男性于 2003 年 10 月至 2007 年 7 月接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术。前瞻性收集数据并输入电子数据库。术后,男性完成了自我管理的验证问卷,包括以下问题:1)每日尿垫使用情况(0、安全、1 或 2 个或更多);2)尿失禁情况(每日、每周约一次、每周少于一次或完全没有);3)尿控情况(无、频繁滴尿、偶尔滴尿或完全控制);4)美国泌尿外科学会症状评分和 5)尿控生活质量。
术后使用 0 个尿垫的男性平均症状评分为 5.8 ± 0.3,且对生活质量感到满意(1.16 ± 0.08)。相比之下,使用安全尿垫和 1 个尿垫的男性症状评分为 7.6 ± 0.7 和 9.2 ± 0.6,但生活质量为混合(分别为 2.78 ± 0.18 和 3.41 ± 0.15,p <0.0005)。
结果显示,无尿垫(1.16 或满意)、安全尿垫和 0 至 1 个尿垫(2.78 和 3.41 或混合)之间的生活质量显著下降。这些发现不支持使用安全尿垫或 0 至 1 个尿垫来定义控尿。控尿应严格定义为 0 个尿垫。