• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

达芬奇 SP 机器人辅助经腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术较经腹腔多孔手术在手术时间和功能恢复方面更快:倾向评分匹配分析比较。

Faster both in operative time and functional recovery by the extraperitoneal daVinci SP-based robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score matching analysis compared to transperitoneal multiport counterpart.

机构信息

Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea.

College of Medicine, Medical Research Center, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2024 May 8;18(1):205. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01950-6.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-024-01950-6
PMID:38714543
Abstract

We aim to investigate the peri-operative outcomes after extraperitoneal single-port based robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (eSP-RARP) utilizing the da Vinci SP system compared to conventional transperitoneal multi-port counterparts (tMP-RARP), in an era when pelvic lymph node dissection (PNLD) was omitted for the node-negative case. With exclusion criteria of volume  + 50 g, suspicious rectal invasion, and node-positive disease given relatively weak grasping power and limited range of motion from the current SP system, 50 consecutive patients (Since December 2021) with localized prostate cancer underwent eSP-RARP by a single urologist maintaining identical surgical technique for 100 consecutive tMP-RARP cases (Since December 2020). Given initial selection criteria, each group was matched to a 1:1 ratio based on the risk-stratification parameters and the prostate volume. The operative time, which was maintained in each group during the study period, was significantly faster in eSP-RARP groups than in tMP-RARP (149.2 vs. 163.2 min, p = 0.025), while the weight of the removed specimen (27.1 vs. 29.0 g, p = 0.420) and margin positivity (14.7% vs. 11.7% in pT2, p = 0.812) were similar. The gas-out (1.5 vs. 1.88 days, p = 0.003) and solid diet dates (2.26 vs. 3.22 days, p < 0.001) were faster in the eSP-RARP group. The single-pad continence dates (30.5 vs. 51.9 days, p = 0.145) and zero-pad continence dates (105.5 vs. 146.2 days, p = 0.210) were identical. 90-day single-pad continence rate was 92% vs. 82% (p = 0.142, 52% vs. 56% in zero-pad continence). Based on these, daVinci SP-based RARP restored bowel function faster with shorter operative time through an extraperitoneal approach than the conventional transperitoneal multi-port counterpart while maintaining similar incontinence outcomes in cases without a routine PNLD.

摘要

我们旨在研究在省略盆腔淋巴结清扫术 (PNLD) 用于淋巴结阴性病例的时代,经腹腔外单端口机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术 (eSP-RARP) 与传统经腹腔多端口对照 (tMP-RARP) 的围手术期结局。鉴于当前 SP 系统相对较弱的抓握力和有限的运动范围,我们排除了体积 + 50 g、可疑直肠侵犯和淋巴结阳性疾病的病例。自 2021 年 12 月以来,50 例局限性前列腺癌患者 (50 例) 由同一位泌尿科医生进行 eSP-RARP,采用相同的手术技术,100 例连续 tMP-RARP 患者 (自 2020 年 12 月以来)。根据初始选择标准,每组根据风险分层参数和前列腺体积按 1:1 比例匹配。在研究期间,eSP-RARP 组的手术时间明显快于 tMP-RARP 组 (149.2 分钟对 163.2 分钟,p=0.025),而切除标本的重量 (27.1 克对 29.0 克,p=0.420) 和切缘阳性率 (pT2 中 14.7%对 11.7%,p=0.812) 相似。eSP-RARP 组的气体排出时间 (1.5 天对 1.88 天,p=0.003) 和固体饮食时间 (2.26 天对 3.22 天,p<0.001) 更快。eSP-RARP 组的单垫控尿时间 (30.5 天对 51.9 天,p=0.145) 和零垫控尿时间 (105.5 天对 146.2 天,p=0.210) 相同。90 天单垫控尿率为 92%对 82% (p=0.142,零垫控尿率为 52%对 56%)。基于这些,达芬奇 SP 机器人辅助 RARP 通过经腹腔外途径恢复肠道功能更快,手术时间更短,而在不常规进行 PNLD 的情况下,保持相似的尿失禁结果。

相似文献

1
Faster both in operative time and functional recovery by the extraperitoneal daVinci SP-based robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score matching analysis compared to transperitoneal multiport counterpart.达芬奇 SP 机器人辅助经腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术较经腹腔多孔手术在手术时间和功能恢复方面更快:倾向评分匹配分析比较。
J Robot Surg. 2024 May 8;18(1):205. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01950-6.
2
Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study.经腹腔与腹膜外机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术:一项前瞻性单术者随机对照研究。
Int J Urol. 2015 Oct;22(10):916-21. doi: 10.1111/iju.12854. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
3
Rate of Symptomatic Lymphocele Formation After Extraperitoneal vs Transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Bilateral Pelvic Lymphadenectomy.腹膜外与经腹机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术及双侧盆腔淋巴结清扫术后有症状性淋巴囊肿形成的发生率。
J Endourol. 2017 Oct;31(10):1037-1043. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0153. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
4
Comparison of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy via modified extraperitoneal approach and transvesical approach.改良腹膜外入路与经膀胱入路机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术的比较
BMC Surg. 2025 Mar 28;25(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02853-5.
5
Early outcomes of single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: lessons learned from the learning-curve experience.单孔机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的早期结果:从学习曲线经验中吸取的教训。
BJU Int. 2021 Jan;127(1):114-121. doi: 10.1111/bju.15158. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
6
Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed with Different Robotic Platforms: First Comparative Evidence Between Da Vinci and HUGO Robot-assisted Surgery Robots.不同机器人平台施行的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:达芬奇和 HUGO 机器人辅助手术机器人之间的首次比较证据。
Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Jan;10(1):107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.08.001. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
7
Extraperitoneal Single Port vs Transperitoneal Multiport Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in frail patients: A propensity score matched comparative analysis.经腹膜外单端口与经腹腔多端口机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗虚弱患者的比较:倾向评分匹配的对比分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec;50(12):108741. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108741. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
8
Use of peritoneal window and abdominal binder to reduce fluid collection after single-port robotic radical prostatectomy.使用腹膜开窗术和腹带减少单孔机器人根治性前列腺切除术后的积液
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 12;19(1):151. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02330-4.
9
Pure Single-site Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using Single-port Versus Multiport Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single-institution Comparative Study.单纯单部位机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与多部位机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的比较:单中心研究。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Sep;7(5):964-972. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.10.006. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
10
[Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer].[经腹与腹膜外机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌]
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2017 Jun;23(6):540-549.

引用本文的文献

1
The current landscape of single-port robotic surgery in urology.泌尿外科单孔机器人手术的当前现状。
Nat Rev Urol. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1038/s41585-025-01081-z.
2
Perioperative efficiency and clinical outcomes of single-port versus multi-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an updated meta-analysis.单孔与多孔机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期效率和临床结果:一项更新的荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 18;19(1):492. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02679-6.
3
Single-Port Extraperitoneal vs. Multiport Transperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Transperitoneal Versus Extraperitoneal Approach for Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜及机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的经腹与腹膜外入路:系统评价与Meta分析
Urol Res Pract. 2023 Sep;49(5):285-292. doi: 10.5152/tud.2023.23008.
2
Single Port Versus Multiport Robot-assisted Simple Prostatectomy: A Multi-institutional Study From the Single-port Advanced Research Consortium (SPARC).单孔与多孔机器人辅助单纯前列腺切除术:来自单孔高级研究联盟(SPARC)的多机构研究。
Urology. 2023 Jun;176:94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.03.022. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
3
Should Contemporary Western Guidelines Based on Studies Conducted in the 2000s Be Adopted for the Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Policy for Asian Men in the 2020s?
单孔腹膜外与多孔经腹机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:倾向评分匹配分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Aug 28;16(17):2994. doi: 10.3390/cancers16172994.
基于21世纪初开展的研究制定的当代西方指南是否应被用于21世纪20年代亚洲男性的前列腺特异性抗原筛查政策?
World J Mens Health. 2022 Oct;40(4):543-550. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.220002. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
4
Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis.腹膜外与经腹腔途径机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:当代系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Apr;16(2):257-264. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01245-0. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
5
Limited versus Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.局限性与广泛性前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结清扫术:一项随机临床试验。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Aug;4(4):532-539. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
6
Extended Versus Limited Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: Early Oncological Outcomes from a Randomized Phase 3 Trial.根治性前列腺切除术治疗中高危前列腺癌时广泛与局限性盆腔淋巴结清扫术的比较:一项随机 3 期试验的早期肿瘤学结局。
Eur Urol. 2021 May;79(5):595-604. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.11.040. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
7
Modified Apical Dissection and Lateral Prostatic Fascia Preservation Improves Early Postoperative Functional Recovery in Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Propensity Score-matched Analysis.改良尖部解剖和侧方前列腺筋膜保留术提高机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后早期功能恢复:倾向评分匹配分析结果。
Eur Urol. 2020 Dec;78(6):875-884. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.041. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
8
Extraperitoneal versus Transperitoneal Single Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes.腹膜外与经腹腔单孔机器人根治性前列腺切除术:围手术期结局的比较分析。
J Urol. 2020 Jun;203(6):1135-1140. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000700. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
9
Extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: initial experience and description of technique.经腹膜外单孔机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:初步经验和技术描述。
BJU Int. 2020 Jan;125(1):182-189. doi: 10.1111/bju.14885. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
10
Screening for prostate cancer: History, evidence, controversies and future perspectives toward individualized screening.前列腺癌筛查:历史、证据、争议以及个体化筛查的未来展望。
Int J Urol. 2019 Oct;26(10):956-970. doi: 10.1111/iju.14039. Epub 2019 Jun 10.