Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanazawa, Japan.
Resuscitation. 2010 May;81(5):562-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.12.012. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
There is no study regarding the influence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guideline renewal on citizen's attitude towards all basic life support (BLS) actions.
We conducted a questionnaire survey to new driver licence applicants who participated in the BLS course at driving schools either before (January 2007 to April 2007) or after (October 2007 to April 2008) the revision of the textbook. Upon completion of the course, participants were given a questionnaire concerning willingness to participate in CPR, early emergency call, telephone-assisted chest compression and use of an automated external defibrillator (AED). After the revision, the proportions of positive respondents to use of AED as well as to all the four scenarios significantly increased from 2331/3564 to 3693/5156 (odds ratio (OR)=1.34) and from 1889/3443 to 3028/5126 (OR=1.18), respectively. However, the new guideline slightly but significantly augmented the unwillingness to make an early call (236/3568 vs. 416/5283, OR=0.83). Approximately 95% of respondents were willing to follow the telephone-assisted instruction of chest compression, while approximately 85% were eager to perform CPR on their own initiative. Multiple logistic regression analysis confirmed the results of mono-variate analysis, and identified previous CPR training, sex, rural area and student as other significant factors relating to attitude.
Future guidelines should emphasise the significance and benefit of early call in relation to telephone-assisted instruction of CPR or chest compression. The course instructors should be aware of the backgrounds of participants as to how this may relate to their willingness to participate.
目前尚无研究探讨心肺复苏(CPR)指南更新对民众对所有基础生命支持(BLS)操作的态度的影响。
我们对在驾驶学校参加 BLS 课程的新驾驶员申请人进行了问卷调查,这些申请人参加课程的时间分别在教材修订之前(2007 年 1 月至 4 月)和之后(2007 年 10 月至 2008 年 4 月)。课程结束后,参与者会收到一份关于是否愿意参与 CPR、尽早紧急呼救、电话辅助胸外按压和使用自动体外除颤器(AED)的问卷。修订后,愿意使用 AED 以及对所有四个场景进行操作的积极应答者的比例从 2331/3564 显著增加到 3693/5156(比值比(OR)=1.34)和 1889/3443 增加到 3028/5126(OR=1.18)。然而,新指南略微但显著地增加了不愿意尽早呼救的比例(236/3568 比 416/5283,OR=0.83)。大约 95%的受访者愿意遵循电话辅助胸外按压的指导,而大约 85%的受访者渴望主动进行 CPR。多变量逻辑回归分析证实了单变量分析的结果,并确定了之前的 CPR 培训、性别、农村地区和学生是与态度相关的其他重要因素。
未来的指南应强调早期呼救与电话辅助 CPR 或胸外按压指导相关的重要性和益处。课程讲师应了解参与者的背景,了解这如何影响他们参与的意愿。