Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud Strasse 25, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Mar;194(3):821-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3306.
The purpose of this study was to compare a macrocyclic 1.0 M contrast agent with a linear ionic 0.5 M contrast agent at equimolar dosage in regard to image quality and number of vessel segments visualized at abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography.
In an intraindividual comparative study, 15 patients (six women, nine men; mean age, 53 +/- 12.1 years; range, 25-72 years) underwent 32 1.5-T whole-body contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiographic examinations performed with parallel imaging technique. At random and in separate sessions, each patient was examined after IV injection of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight 1.0 M macrocyclic gadobutrol and 0.5 M linear ionic gadopentetate dimeglumine. Three-dimensional data sets were acquired in the arterial, portal venous, and venous phases with identical imaging protocols. Quantitative analysis included contrast measurements of vessels compared with adjacent background tissue (Student's t test). Qualitative analysis was performed independently by two radiologists with regard to visualization of arterial and venous vessel segments and overall image quality (Wilcoxon's test).
Visualization of individual vessel segments was rated significantly better after administration of 1.0 M macrocyclic gadobutrol compared with 0.5 M linear ionic gadopentetate dimeglumine (p < 0.001). Overall image quality was superior with 1.0 M macrocyclic gadobutrol, but the difference was not significant. Vessel-to-background contrast after injection of 1.0 M macrocyclic gadobutrol was significantly higher (arterial phase, 0.90, p = 0.02; portal venous phase, 0.78, p = 0.0002; venous phase, 0.74, p = 0.0002) compared with 0.5 M linear ionic gadopentetate dimeglumine (arterial phase, 0.89; portal venous phase, 0.73; venous phase, 0.67).
At abdominal contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography, depiction of small abdominal vessels was significantly better and vessel-to-tissue contrast significantly higher with 1.0 M macrocyclic gadobutrol than with an equimolar dose of 0.5 M linear ionic gadopentetate dimeglumine.
本研究旨在对比同等剂量的大环 1.0 M 对比剂与线性离子 0.5 M 对比剂,在腹部动态对比增强 3D MR 血管造影中,评估其图像质量和可视的血管节段数量。
在一项个体内比较研究中,15 名患者(6 名女性,9 名男性;平均年龄 53±12.1 岁;范围 25-72 岁)接受了 32 次 1.5-T 全身对比增强 3D MR 血管造影检查,采用并行成像技术。随机且在单独的时段,每位患者在静脉注射 0.1mmol/kg 体重的 1.0 M 大环钆布醇和 0.5 M 线性离子钆喷替酸二甲胺后,分别进行检查。采用相同的成像方案获得动脉期、门静脉期和静脉期的三维数据集。定量分析包括与相邻背景组织的血管对比测量(Student's t 检验)。两位放射科医生独立进行动脉和静脉血管节段的可视化以及整体图像质量的定性分析(Wilcoxon 检验)。
与 0.5 M 线性离子钆喷替酸二甲胺相比,1.0 M 大环钆布醇给药后,个体血管节段的可视化评分显著更高(p<0.001)。使用 1.0 M 大环钆布醇时整体图像质量更好,但差异无统计学意义。注射 1.0 M 大环钆布醇后的血管与背景对比明显更高(动脉期,0.90,p=0.02;门静脉期,0.78,p=0.0002;静脉期,0.74,p=0.0002),与 0.5 M 线性离子钆喷替酸二甲胺相比(动脉期,0.89;门静脉期,0.73;静脉期,0.67)。
在腹部对比增强 3D MR 血管造影中,与同等剂量的 0.5 M 线性离子钆喷替酸二甲胺相比,1.0 M 大环钆布醇可显著改善小腹部血管的显示效果,且血管与组织的对比明显更高。