• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手辅助腹腔镜与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的比较

Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic and open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

作者信息

Wang Sheng-Zheng, Chen Ling-Wu, Zhang Yong-Hai, Wang Wen-Wei, Chen Wei, Lin Huan-Yi

机构信息

Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, PR China.

出版信息

Urol Int. 2010;84(1):28-33. doi: 10.1159/000273462. Epub 2010 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1159/000273462
PMID:20173365
Abstract

PURPOSE

To present our experience of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy (HALRC) and compare it with open radical cystectomy (ORC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During the period between May 2004 and November 2007, 31 patients underwent HALRC and 39 patients underwent ORC for bladder cancer. The patient demographics, intraoperative variables and postoperative outcomes were compared retrospectively.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference with regard to age, sex, body mass index, and urinary diversion in the 2 groups. In the HALRC group, 20 patients had stage pT2 or less, 7 had pT3 disease, and 4 had stage pT4 disease. In the ORC group, 29 patients had stage pT2 or less, 5 had pT3 disease, and 5 had stage pT4 disease. All margins in both groups were negative. The HALRC group had decreased blood loss (250.9 vs. 812.8 ml, p < 0.001) and a lower rate of transfusion (9.7 vs. 76.9%, p < 0.001), but similar mean operative time (365.7 vs. 362.6 min, p = 0.862). Time to liquid diet was significantly less in the HALRC group versus the ORC group (4.3 vs. 6.3 days, p < 0.001). The median number of lymph nodes were similar between the HALRC and ORC groups (14 vs. 15, p = 0.377). Six patients developed perioperative complications in the HALRC group and 12 patients had complications in the ORC group (19.4 vs. 30.8%, p = 0.278). Late complications occurred in 3 patients (2 parastomal hernias and 1 ureteroenteral stricture) in the HALRC group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with ORC, HALRC patients had decreased blood loss, less transfusion requirements, and quicker intestinal recovery. Long-term follow-up in a larger cohort of patients is needed to assess the long-term oncological and functional outcomes.

摘要

目的

介绍我们开展手辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术(HALRC)的经验,并将其与开放性根治性膀胱切除术(ORC)进行比较。

患者与方法

在2004年5月至2007年11月期间,31例患者接受了HALRC,39例患者接受了ORC治疗膀胱癌。对患者的人口统计学资料、术中变量和术后结果进行回顾性比较。

结果

两组在年龄、性别、体重指数和尿流改道方面无统计学显著差异。在HALRC组中,20例患者为pT2期或更低分期,7例为pT3期疾病,4例为pT4期疾病。在ORC组中,29例患者为pT2期或更低分期,5例为pT3期疾病,5例为pT4期疾病。两组的所有切缘均为阴性。HALRC组的失血量减少(250.9对812.8 ml,p < 0.001),输血率较低(9.7%对76.9%,p < 0.001),但平均手术时间相似(365.7对362.6分钟,p = 0.862)。HALRC组恢复流食的时间明显短于ORC组(4.3对6.3天,p < 0.001)。HALRC组和ORC组的中位淋巴结数量相似(14对15,p = 0.377)。HALRC组有6例患者发生围手术期并发症,ORC组有12例患者发生并发症(19.4%对30.8%,p = 0.278)。HALRC组有3例患者发生晚期并发症(2例造口旁疝和1例输尿管肠吻合口狭窄)。

结论

与ORC相比,HALRC患者失血量减少,输血需求降低,肠道恢复更快。需要对更大队列的患者进行长期随访,以评估长期肿瘤学和功能结果。

相似文献

1
Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic and open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.手辅助腹腔镜与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的比较
Urol Int. 2010;84(1):28-33. doi: 10.1159/000273462. Epub 2010 Feb 17.
2
Hand-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical cystectomy: a clinical outcome comparison.手辅助与单纯腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术:临床结果比较
Int J Urol. 2009 Apr;16(4):360-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2009.02267.x. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
3
Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy for the management of bladder cancer: mid-term oncological outcome.腹腔镜与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌:中期肿瘤学结果。
Int J Urol. 2010 Jan;17(1):55-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2009.02425.x. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
4
Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical cystoprostatectomy for localized bladder cancer with 3-year oncological followup: a single surgeon experience.腹腔镜与开放性根治性膀胱前列腺切除术治疗局限性膀胱癌的3年肿瘤学随访比较:单中心经验
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2340-3. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.020. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
5
[Compare of laparoscopic and open surgery for radical cystectomy with orthotopic ileal neobladder].腹腔镜与开放手术行根治性膀胱切除术并原位回肠新膀胱术的比较
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Dec 15;46(24):1870-4.
6
Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy and extracorporeal urinary diversion: experience with 31 cases.手辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术及体外尿液改道:31例经验
Int J Urol. 2008 Dec;15(12):1035-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02167.x.
7
Robotic vs open radical cystectomy: prospective comparison of perioperative outcomes and pathological measures of early oncological efficacy.机器人辅助与开放性根治性膀胱切除术:围手术期结局及早期肿瘤学疗效病理指标的前瞻性比较
BJU Int. 2008 Jan;101(1):89-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07212.x. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
8
Robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: surgical and pathological outcomes in 100 consecutive cases.机器人根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌:100 例连续病例的手术和病理结果。
J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):510-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.027. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
9
Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results.机器人辅助与开放根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的前瞻性随机对照研究:围手术期和病理结果。
Eur Urol. 2010 Feb;57(2):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.10.024. Epub 2009 Oct 20.
10
Perioperative outcomes with laparoscopic radical cystectomy: "pure laparoscopic" and "open-assisted laparoscopic" approaches.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的围手术期结局:“纯腹腔镜”和“开放辅助腹腔镜”手术方式
Urology. 2007 Nov;70(5):910-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of a Triad of Norepinephrine, Tranexamic Acid, and Endo-Cutter Staplers on the Reduction of Blood Loss and Operative Duration in Patients Undergoing Open Radical Cystectomy.去甲肾上腺素、氨甲环酸和腔内切割吻合器三联疗法对开放性根治性膀胱切除术患者减少失血及缩短手术时间的影响。
Cureus. 2025 May 21;17(5):e84569. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84569. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic radical cystectomy in bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助与标准腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 9;12:1024739. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1024739. eCollection 2022.
3
Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy in 607 patients with bladder cancer: Comparative survival analysis.
腹腔镜与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗 607 例膀胱癌患者的比较生存分析。
Int J Urol. 2021 Jun;28(6):673-680. doi: 10.1111/iju.14537. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
4
Bayesian network analysis of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.基于贝叶斯网络的膀胱癌开放式、腹腔镜式和机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 24;99(52):e23645. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023645.
5
[Propensity-matched comparison of laparoscopic and open radical cystectomy for female patients with bladder cancer].[腹腔镜与开放根治性膀胱切除术治疗女性膀胱癌患者的倾向评分匹配比较]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019 Aug 18;51(4):698-705. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.04.018.
6
Laparoscopic versus open radical cystectomy in bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.腹腔镜与开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌:系统评价和比较研究的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2014 May 16;9(5):e95667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095667. eCollection 2014.
7
Bladder cancer--the neglected tumor: a descriptive analysis of publications referenced in MEDLINE and data from the register ClinicalTrials.gov.膀胱癌——被忽视的肿瘤:对 MEDLINE 中引用的文献和 ClinicalTrials.gov 登记数据的描述性分析。
BMC Urol. 2013 Oct 24;13:56. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-13-56.