Sastry Narayan, McGonagle Katherine, Schoeni Robert F
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, USA.
Biodemography Soc Biol. 2009;55(2):113-7. doi: 10.1080/19485560903446141.
This special issue of Biodemography and Social Demography assesses the value to social science and health research of incorporating biomeasures in a social survey. The focus is on the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), an ongoing, nationally representative panel study of U.S. households. A brief description of the PSID and the features that make it a promising survey for biomeasures is provided along with an overview of each individual article. Seven of the nine articles cover a major health domain: fatness and obesity, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease, infectious disease, inflammation and immune function and cardiovascular disease, daily stress exposure and reactivity, respiratory health, and genetics. These articles describe the scientific rationale for collecting data in each domain as well as the specific biological samples or measurements needed to assess the domain, potential respondent burden, ethical- and legal issues, fieldwork logistics, and costs. The final two articles address a pair of overarching issues: one provides international comparisons and perspectives and the other discusses ethical and legal concerns.
本期《生物人口学与社会人口学》特刊评估了在社会调查中纳入生物测量方法对社会科学和健康研究的价值。重点是收入动态面板研究(PSID),这是一项正在进行的、具有全国代表性的美国家庭面板研究。文章简要介绍了PSID及其适合进行生物测量的特点,并概述了每篇文章。九篇文章中有七篇涵盖了一个主要健康领域:肥胖症、代谢综合征与心血管疾病、传染病、炎症与免疫功能及心血管疾病、日常压力暴露与反应、呼吸健康以及遗传学。这些文章阐述了在每个领域收集数据的科学依据,以及评估该领域所需的特定生物样本或测量方法、潜在的受访者负担、伦理和法律问题、实地调查后勤工作以及成本。最后两篇文章讨论了两个总体问题:一篇提供国际比较和观点,另一篇讨论伦理和法律问题。