Suppr超能文献

单脐孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的不同疼痛评分:一项随机对照试验。

Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Departments of Surgery, G Hatzikosta General Hospital, Hippocratus 3, Stavraki, GR-45332 Ioannina, Greece.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2010 Aug;24(8):1842-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0887-3. Epub 2010 Feb 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The attempt to further reduce operative trauma in laparoscopic cholecystectomy has led to new techniques such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). These new techniques are considered to be painless procedures, but no published studies investigate the possibility of different pain scores in these new techniques versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In this randomized control study, we investigated pain scores in SILS cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty patients (34 women and 6 men) were randomly assigned to two groups. In group A (n = 20) four-port classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Patients in group B (n = 20) underwent SILS cholecystectomy. In all patients, preincisional local infiltration of ropivacaine around the trocar wounds was performed. Infusion of ropivacaine solution in the right subdiaphragmatic area at the beginning of the procedure plus normal saline infusion in the same area at the end of the procedure was performed in all patients as well. Shoulder tip and abdominal pain were registered at 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively using visual analog scale (VAS).

RESULTS

Significantly lower pain scores were observed in the SILS group versus the classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy group after the first 12 h for abdominal pain, and after the first 6 h for shoulder pain. Total pain after the first 24 h was nonexistent in the SILS group. Also, requests for analgesics were significantly less in the SILS group, while no difference was observed in incidence of nausea and vomiting between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

SILS cholecystectomy, as well as the invisible scar, has significantly lower abdominal and shoulder pain scores, especially after the first 24 h postoperatively, when this pain is nonexistent. (Registration Clinical Trial number: NTC00872287, www.clinicaltrials.gov ).

摘要

背景

为了进一步减少腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术创伤,人们尝试了一些新技术,如经自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)和单孔腹腔镜手术(SILS)。这些新技术被认为是无痛的,但尚无研究探讨这些新技术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术之间可能存在的不同疼痛评分。在这项随机对照研究中,我们比较了 SILS 胆囊切除术与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的疼痛评分。

患者和方法

将 40 名患者(34 名女性和 6 名男性)随机分为两组。A 组(n=20)行四孔法传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术,B 组(n=20)行 SILS 胆囊切除术。所有患者均在切口周围局部浸润罗哌卡因。所有患者在手术开始时于右膈下区域输注罗哌卡因溶液,并在手术结束时于同一区域输注生理盐水。术后 2、6、12、24、48 和 72 h 时采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)记录肩部和腹部疼痛。

结果

SILS 组术后 12 h 内腹部疼痛和 6 h 内肩部疼痛的疼痛评分明显低于传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术组。SILS 组术后 24 h 内的总疼痛完全消失,而 SILS 组要求镇痛的次数明显减少,但两组的恶心和呕吐发生率无差异。

结论

SILS 胆囊切除术以及隐形疤痕的存在使腹部和肩部疼痛评分明显降低,特别是术后 24 h 内疼痛完全消失。(注册号:NTC00872287,www.clinicaltrials.gov)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验