Department of Psychology, The University of Iowa, 11 Seashore Hall East, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 May;25(5):397-402. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1249-5. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
Past work suggests that the degree of similarity between patient and physician attitudes may be an important predictor of patient-centered outcomes.
To examine the extent to which patient and provider symmetry in health locus of control (HLOC) beliefs was associated with objectively derived medication refill adherence in patients with co-morbid diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HTN).
Eighteen primary care physicians at the VA Iowa City Medical Center and affiliated clinics; 246 patients of consented providers with co-morbid DM and HTN.
Established patient-physician dyads were classified into three groups according to the similarity of their HLOC scores (assessed in parallel). Data analysis utilized hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) to account for clustering of patients within physicians.
Objectively derived medication refill adherence was computed using data from the VA electronic pharmacy record; blood pressure and HgA1c values were considered as secondary outcomes.
Physician-patient dyads holding highly similar beliefs regarding the degree of personal control that individual patients have over health outcomes showed significantly higher overall and cardiovascular medication regimen adherence (p = 0.03) and lower diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.02) than in dyads in which the patient held a stronger belief in their own personal control than did their treating physician. Dyads in which patients held a weaker belief in their own personal control than did their treating physician did not differ significantly from symmetrical dyads. The same pattern was observed after adjustment for age, physician sex, and physician years of practice.
These data are the first to demonstrate the importance of attitudinal symmetry on an objective measure of medication adherence and suggest that a brief assessment of patient HLOC may be useful for tailoring the provider's approach in the clinical encounter or for matching patients to physicians with similar attitudes towards care.
过去的研究表明,医患态度的相似程度可能是患者中心结局的重要预测因素。
研究患者和提供者在健康控制源(HLOC)信念上的对称性与共病糖尿病(DM)和高血压(HTN)患者客观获得的药物补充依从性之间的关系。
VA 爱荷华市医疗中心及其附属诊所的 18 名初级保健医生;同意提供者的 246 名患有共病 DM 和 HTN 的患者。
根据 HLOC 评分的相似性(并行评估),将已建立的患者-医生对分为三组。数据分析利用分层线性建模(HLM)来解释医生内患者的聚类。
使用 VA 电子药房记录中的数据计算客观获得的药物补充依从性;血压和 HgA1c 值被视为次要结果。
在个人对健康结果的控制程度方面,医生和患者具有高度相似信念的医患对表现出显著更高的整体和心血管药物治疗方案依从性(p = 0.03)和更低的舒张压(p = 0.02),而在患者对自己的个人控制能力比治疗医生更强的对中。患者对自己的个人控制能力比治疗医生更弱的对与对称对没有显著差异。在调整了年龄、医生性别和医生从业年限后,也观察到了同样的模式。
这些数据首次证明了在客观药物依从性测量上态度对称的重要性,并表明对患者 HLOC 的简要评估可能有助于调整提供者在临床接触中的方法,或为患者匹配具有相似护理态度的医生。