• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

RT3 加速度计测量青少年身体活动的可靠性。

Reliability of the RT3 accelerometer for measurement of physical activity in adolescents.

机构信息

Laboratoire RELACS, Université du Littoral Côte d'Opale, Dunkerque.

出版信息

J Sports Sci. 2010 Feb;28(4):375-9. doi: 10.1080/02640410903502790.

DOI:10.1080/02640410903502790
PMID:20175016
Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of the RT3 accelerometer under conditions of normal physical activity. Sixty healthy individuals (30 boys, 30 girls) aged 10-16 years wore two accelerometers while performing different structured physical activities. The accelerometers were synchronized and data were recorded every minute during nine 15-min sessions of physical activity that varied in intensity from sedentary (watching television, playing video games) to vigorous (running on a treadmill at different speeds). Intra-instrument coefficients of variation (CV) were assessed using the formula CV = standard deviation of the measure x 100/mean of the measure. The intra-instrument coefficient of variation was higher for sedentary (17%) and light activity (16.2%) than moderate (9.3%) and vigorous activity (6.6%). These results confirmed the poor reliability of the RT3 for activity of low magnitude and frequency that was demonstrated in studies using a shaker.

摘要

本研究旨在评估 RT3 加速度计在正常体力活动条件下的可靠性。60 名健康个体(30 名男孩,30 名女孩)佩戴两个加速度计,同时进行不同的结构化体力活动。加速度计同步,在 9 个 15 分钟的体力活动期间,每 1 分钟记录一次数据,活动强度从静坐(看电视、玩电子游戏)到剧烈(在不同速度的跑步机上跑步)不等。使用公式 CV = 测量的标准差 x 100/测量的平均值来评估仪器内的变异系数 (CV)。仪器内的 CV 对于静坐(17%)和低强度活动(16.2%)高于中等强度(9.3%)和剧烈活动(6.6%)。这些结果证实了 RT3 在使用振动器进行的研究中表现出的低幅度和低频率活动的可靠性较差。

相似文献

1
Reliability of the RT3 accelerometer for measurement of physical activity in adolescents.RT3 加速度计测量青少年身体活动的可靠性。
J Sports Sci. 2010 Feb;28(4):375-9. doi: 10.1080/02640410903502790.
2
Calibration of the RT3 accelerometer for various patterns of physical activity in children and adolescents.RT3 加速度计在儿童和青少年各种运动模式下的校准。
J Sports Sci. 2010 Feb;28(4):381-7. doi: 10.1080/02640410903508821.
3
Comparative interinstrument reliability of uniaxial and triaxial accelerometers in free-living conditions.在自由生活条件下,单轴和三轴加速度计的仪器间可靠性比较。
Percept Mot Skills. 2012 Apr;114(2):584-94. doi: 10.2466/03.26.PMS.114.2.584-594.
4
Actigraph accelerometer interinstrument reliability during free-living in adults.成人自由生活期间活动记录仪加速度计的仪器间可靠性。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Sep;39(9):1509-14. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180dc9954.
5
Exploring actical accelerometers as an objective measure of physical activity in people with multiple sclerosis.探索实用加速度计作为多发性硬化症患者身体活动的客观测量方法。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Apr;90(4):594-601. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.10.012.
6
Equivalence of accelerometer data for walking and running: treadmill versus on land.步行和跑步时加速度计数据的等效性:跑步机与陆地情况对比
J Sports Sci. 2009 May;27(7):669-75. doi: 10.1080/02640410802680580.
7
Decision boundaries and receiver operating characteristic curves: new methods for determining accelerometer cutpoints.决策边界与接收器操作特性曲线:确定加速度计切点的新方法。
J Sports Sci. 2007 Jun;25(8):937-44. doi: 10.1080/02640410600908027.
8
Reliability of physical activity measures from accelerometry among preschoolers in free-living conditions.自由生活条件下学龄前儿童通过加速度计测量身体活动的可靠性。
Clin Nutr. 2007 Aug;26(4):416-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2007.03.009. Epub 2007 May 18.
9
Physical activity and inactivity in an adult population assessed by accelerometry.通过加速度计评估的成年人群的身体活动与不活动情况。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Sep;39(9):1502-8. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180a76de5.
10
Reliability and validity of the instrument used in BRFSS to assess physical activity.行为危险因素监测系统(BRFSS)中用于评估身体活动的工具的信度和效度。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Aug;39(8):1267-74. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180618bbe.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of four sensor locations for physical activity assessment.用于身体活动评估的四个传感器位置的评估。
Appl Ergon. 2016 Mar;53 Pt A(Pt A):103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
2
Validity of the global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ) in assessing levels and change in moderate-vigorous physical activity and sedentary behaviour.全球体力活动问卷(GPAQ)在评估中等强度至剧烈体力活动及久坐行为水平与变化方面的效度。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 10;14:1255. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1255.
3
Home-based system for physical activity monitoring in patients with multiple sclerosis (Pilot study).
用于多发性硬化症患者身体活动监测的居家系统(试点研究)。
Biomed Eng Online. 2014 Feb 6;13:10. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-13-10.
4
Comparison of uniaxial and triaxial accelerometry in the assessment of physical activity among adolescents under free-living conditions: the HELENA study.在自由生活条件下评估青少年身体活动的单轴和三轴加速度计比较:HELENA 研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Mar 12;12:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-26.