• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

走向绿色以被看见:地位、声誉和明显的保护。

Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation.

机构信息

Department of Marketing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Mar;98(3):392-404. doi: 10.1037/a0017346.

DOI:10.1037/a0017346
PMID:20175620
Abstract

Why do people purchase proenvironmental "green" products? We argue that buying such products can be construed as altruistic, since green products often cost more and are of lower quality than their conventional counterparts, but green goods benefit the environment for everyone. Because biologists have observed that altruism might function as a "costly signal" associated with status, we examined in 3 experiments how status motives influenced desire for green products. Activating status motives led people to choose green products over more luxurious nongreen products. Supporting the notion that altruism signals one's willingness and ability to incur costs for others' benefit, status motives increased desire for green products when shopping in public (but not private) and when green products cost more (but not less) than nongreen products. Findings suggest that status competition can be used to promote proenvironmental behavior.

摘要

人们为什么购买环保的“绿色”产品?我们认为,购买此类产品可以被视为利他主义,因为绿色产品通常比传统产品成本更高,质量更低,但绿色商品对每个人都有益环境。因为生物学家观察到,利他主义可能是一种与地位相关的“昂贵信号”,所以我们在 3 项实验中检验了地位动机如何影响对绿色产品的渴望。激发地位动机使人们选择绿色产品而不是更豪华的非绿色产品。这一观点支持了利他主义表明一个人愿意并有能力为他人的利益承担成本的观点,当在公共场合(而不是私人场合)购物时,以及当绿色产品的成本高于(而不是低于)非绿色产品时,地位动机会增加对绿色产品的需求。研究结果表明,地位竞争可以用来促进环保行为。

相似文献

1
Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation.走向绿色以被看见:地位、声誉和明显的保护。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Mar;98(3):392-404. doi: 10.1037/a0017346.
2
Do green products make us better people?绿色产品能让我们变得更好吗?
Psychol Sci. 2010 Apr;21(4):494-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797610363538. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
3
Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: when romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals.公然的善意与炫耀性消费:浪漫动机引发策略性高成本信号之时。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jul;93(1):85-102. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.85.
4
Nice guys finish first: the competitive altruism hypothesis.好人先赢:竞争性利他主义假说。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Oct;32(10):1402-13. doi: 10.1177/0146167206291006.
5
Motivation in Italian whole blood donors and the role of commitment.意大利全血献血者的动机和承诺的作用。
Psychol Health Med. 2011 Dec;16(6):641-9. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2011.569731. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
6
role of altruistic behavior, empathetic concern, and social responsibility motivation in blood donation behavior.利他行为、同理心关怀和社会责任动机在献血行为中的作用。
Transfusion. 2008 Jan;48(1):43-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01481.x. Epub 2007 Sep 24.
7
Cooperation, Trust, and Antagonism: How Public Goods Are Promoted.合作、信任与对抗:公共物品如何得到促进。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2013 Dec;14(3):119-65. doi: 10.1177/1529100612474436.
8
How will I be remembered? Conserving the environment for the sake of one's legacy.后人会如何铭记我?为了自己的遗产而保护环境。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Feb;26(2):231-6. doi: 10.1177/0956797614561266. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
9
Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system.孔雀、保时捷和索尔斯坦·凡勃伦:炫耀性消费作为一种性信号系统。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Apr;100(4):664-80. doi: 10.1037/a0021669.
10
Children's sensitivity to ulterior motives when evaluating prosocial behavior.儿童在评估亲社会行为时对潜在动机的敏感性。
Cogn Sci. 2014 May-Jun;38(4):683-700. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12089. Epub 2013 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
A functionalist approach to social status in social animals, humans and the dog-human community. The prestige-based social system hypothesis.一种关于社会动物、人类以及人与狗群体中社会地位的功能主义方法。基于声望的社会系统假说。
Biol Futur. 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1007/s42977-025-00279-x.
2
Enhanced "Green Nudging": Tapping the channels of cultural transmission.强化“绿色助推”:利用文化传播渠道
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 8;20(8):e0328434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328434. eCollection 2025.
3
Not evolved to save the planet, yet capable to promote pro-environmental action leveraging human nature.
并非为拯救地球而进化,但却有能力利用人性来推动有利于环保的行动。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 16;16:1571765. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1571765. eCollection 2025.
4
How Will I Evaluate Others? The Influence of "Versailles Literature" Language Style on Social Media on Consumer Attitudes Towards Evaluating Green Consumption Behavior.我将如何评价他人?社交媒体上“凡尔赛文学”语言风格对消费者评价绿色消费行为态度的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 17;15(7):968. doi: 10.3390/bs15070968.
5
Ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation in intergenerational cooperation.代际合作中的内群体偏袒和外群体贬损
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jun 6;3(1):89. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00272-z.
6
Social observation modulates the influence of socioeconomic status on pro-environmental behavior: an event-related potential study.社会观察调节社会经济地位对亲环境行为的影响:一项事件相关电位研究。
Front Neurosci. 2024 Aug 9;18:1428659. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1428659. eCollection 2024.
7
Be careful what you wish for: Individuals perceived to desire status are afforded less status.小心你的愿望:被认为渴望地位的人会被给予较少的地位。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 25;19(6):e0304727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304727. eCollection 2024.
8
Research on the negative effect of product scarcity appeals on the purchase intention of green products and its mechanism.产品稀缺诉求对绿色产品购买意愿的负面影响及其作用机制研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 8;15:1225011. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1225011. eCollection 2024.
9
Turning pain into strength: prosocial behaviours in coping with trauma.将痛苦转化为力量:应对创伤中的亲社会行为。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2330302. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2330302. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
10
Beauty Beware: Associations between Perceptions of Harm and Safer Hair-Product-Purchasing Behaviors in a Cross-Sectional Study of Adults Affiliated with a University in the Northeast.美丽需警惕:一项针对东北地区某大学成人关联群体的横断面研究显示,对危害的认知与更安全的美发产品购买行为之间存在关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Nov 30;20(23):7129. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20237129.