San Diego Cardiac Center, 3131 Berger Ave, San Diego, CA 92123, USA.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Mar;139(3):753-7.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.11.018.
In-hospital cardiac arrest or refractory shock carries a high mortality despite the use of advanced resuscitative measures. We have implemented an in-hospital, nurse-based, continuously available, percutaneous, venoarterial cardiopulmonary bypass system, also known as extracorporeal life support (ECLS), as an adjunct to resuscitation when initial measures are ineffective.
In 1986, a system for the rapid initiation of ECLS, was created in which trained critical care nurses primed an ECLS circuit and in-house physicians percutaneously placed required cannulas. From a prospective registry, we assessed long-term survival (LTS) (> or =30 days, cardiopulmonary support weaned), short-term survival (<30 days, CPS weaned), or death on CPS.
One hundred fifty patients (age, 57 +/- 17 years) were urgently started on CPS for cardiac arrest (n = 127; witnessed, n = 124; unwitnessed, n = 3) and refractory shock (n = 23). Sixty-nine patients were weaned from CPS, and 81 could not be weaned. Overall, 39 (26.0%) patients achieved LTS with a subsequent Kaplan-Meier median survival of 9.5 years. Duration of CPS was 32 +/- 38 hours for LTS and 21 +/- 38 hours for non-LTS. LTS occurred in 29 (23.4%) of 124 patients started on CPS for witnessed cardiac arrest and 11 (47.8%) of 23 for refractory shock (P < .05). Among patients with CPS initiated in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, LTS was seen in 24 (50.0%) of 48 versus 15 (14.7%) of 102 in patients with CPS initiated in other locations (P < .001). Cardiopulmonary resuscitation times greater than or equal to 30 minutes were associated with lower LTS (P < .05). The most common cause of death during CPS was refractory cardiac dysfunction (39.5%), and the most common cause associated with short-term survival was neurologic/pulmonary dysfunction (53.6%). Seven patients were bridged to a left ventricular assist device, and 1 subsequently underwent heart transplantation. Multivariate analysis revealed only cardiac catheterization laboratory site of initiation as a significant independent predictor of LTS (P < .01). When dividing the 20-year experience in tertiles, recent recipients have had more common prearrest insertion. Rates of long-term survival have not changed.
Of patients started on CPS, 46% were weaned, and 26.0% were long-time survivors. Rapid initiation of CPS permits LTS for some inpatients with cardiovascular collapse when initial advanced resuscitation fails. Strategies to improve end-organ function associated with use of CPS should lead to greater LTS. This practical application of inexpensive available technology should be more widely used.
尽管采用了先进的复苏措施,院内心搏骤停或难治性休克的死亡率仍然很高。我们已经实施了一种院内、基于护士的、持续可用的经皮动静脉心肺旁路系统,也称为体外生命支持(ECLS),作为初始措施无效时复苏的辅助手段。
1986 年,我们创建了一种快速启动 ECLS 的系统,经过培训的重症监护护士为 ECLS 回路进行了预充,内部医生进行了经皮放置所需的导管。从前瞻性登记中,我们评估了长期生存(LTS)(> = 30 天,心肺支持脱机)、短期生存(<30 天,CPS 脱机)或 CPS 死亡。
150 名患者(年龄 57 +/- 17 岁)因心搏骤停(n = 127;目击,n = 124;非目击,n = 3)和难治性休克(n = 23)紧急开始 CPS。69 名患者从 CPS 脱机,81 名患者无法脱机。总的来说,39 名(26.0%)患者实现了 LTS,随后的 Kaplan-Meier 中位生存时间为 9.5 年。LTS 的 CPS 持续时间为 32 +/- 38 小时,非 LTS 为 21 +/- 38 小时。在因目击心搏骤停而开始 CPS 的 124 名患者中,有 29 名(23.4%)实现了 LTS,在因难治性休克而开始 CPS 的 23 名患者中,有 11 名(47.8%)实现了 LTS(P <.05)。在在导管室开始 CPS 的患者中,有 24 名(50.0%)实现了 LTS,而在在其他位置开始 CPS 的 102 名患者中,有 15 名(14.7%)实现了 LTS(P <.001)。CPR 时间大于或等于 30 分钟与较低的 LTS 相关(P <.05)。CPS 期间死亡的最常见原因是难治性心功能障碍(39.5%),与短期生存相关的最常见原因是神经/肺功能障碍(53.6%)。7 名患者被桥接到左心室辅助装置,其中 1 名随后接受了心脏移植。多变量分析显示,只有导管室的启动地点是 LTS 的显著独立预测因素(P <.01)。当将 20 年的经验分为三分位数时,最近接受者更常见在心脏骤停前插入。长期生存的比例没有变化。
接受 CPS 的患者中,有 46%脱机,26.0%是长期幸存者。当初始高级复苏失败时,快速启动 CPS 可以使一些心血管衰竭的住院患者实现 LTS。应采用提高与 CPS 相关的终末器官功能的策略,以提高 LTS。这种廉价可用技术的实际应用应该得到更广泛的应用。