临床实验室评估即刻型过敏反应。

Clinical laboratory assessment of immediate-type hypersensitivity.

机构信息

Allergy and Clinical Immunology Division, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md, USA.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Feb;125(2 Suppl 2):S284-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.09.055.

Abstract

Clinical laboratory analyses aid in the diagnosis and management of human allergic (IgE-dependent) diseases. Diagnosis of immediate-type hypersensitivity begins with a thorough clinical history and physical examination. Once symptoms compatible with an allergic disorder have been identified, a skin test, blood test, or both for allergen-specific IgE antibodies provide confirmation of sensitization, which strengthens the diagnosis. Skin testing provides a biologically relevant immediate-type hypersensitivity response with resultant wheal-and-flare reactions within 15 minutes of allergen application. Allergen-specific IgE antibody in serum is quantified by using 3 laboratory-based autoanalyzers (ImmunoCAP, Immulite, and HYTEC-288) and novel microarray and lateral-flow immunoassays. Technologic advances in serologic allergen-specific IgE measurements have involved increased automation, with enhanced reproducibility, greater quantification, lower analytic sensitivity, and component-supplemented extract-based allergen use. In vivo provocation tests involving inhalation, ingestion, or injection of allergens serve to clarify discordant history and skin- or blood-based measures of sensitization. Other diagnostic allergy laboratory analyses include total and free serum IgE measurement, precipitating IgG antibodies specific for organic dusts, mast cell tryptase, and indicator allergen analyses to assess indoor environments to promote patient-targeted allergen avoidance programs. A critique is provided on the predictive utility of serologic measures of specific IgE for food allergy and asthma. Reasons for the lack of clinical utility for food-specific IgG/IgG4 measurements in allergy diagnosis are examined. When the specific IgE measures are inconsistent with the clinical history, they should be confirmed by means of repeat and alternative method analysis. Ultimately, the patient's clinical history remains the principal arbiter that determines the final diagnosis of allergic disease.

摘要

临床实验室分析有助于诊断和管理人类过敏性(IgE 依赖性)疾病。立即型超敏反应的诊断始于全面的临床病史和体格检查。一旦确定了与过敏疾病相符的症状,就可以进行皮肤试验、血液试验或两者兼用来检测过敏原特异性 IgE 抗体,以确认致敏,从而加强诊断。皮肤试验提供了与生物学相关的立即型超敏反应,在过敏原应用后 15 分钟内产生风团和红晕反应。使用 3 种基于实验室的自动分析仪(ImmunoCAP、Immulite 和 HYTEC-288)和新型微阵列和侧向流动免疫分析来定量血清中的过敏原特异性 IgE 抗体。血清过敏原特异性 IgE 测量的技术进步涉及增加自动化程度,提高了重现性、定量性、降低了分析灵敏度,并补充了成分的基于提取物的过敏原使用。涉及吸入、摄入或注射过敏原的体内激发试验有助于澄清不一致的病史和皮肤或血液中过敏的致敏测量。其他诊断性过敏实验室分析包括总血清 IgE 和游离血清 IgE 测量、针对有机粉尘的特异性沉淀 IgG 抗体、肥大细胞胰蛋白酶和指示性过敏原分析,以评估室内环境,促进针对患者的过敏原回避计划。本文对血清特异性 IgE 测量在食物过敏和哮喘中的预测效用进行了评价。还检查了过敏原诊断中特异性 IgG/IgG4 测量缺乏临床效用的原因。当特异性 IgE 测量与临床病史不一致时,应通过重复和替代方法分析来确认。最终,患者的临床病史仍然是决定过敏疾病最终诊断的主要判断者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索