Section of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2010 Jun;21(4 Pt 1):623-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2009.00956.x. Epub 2009 Dec 9.
Our aims were to evaluate the performance of an automated microfluidic immunoassay system for measuring allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) in sera against an established in vitro assay and to assess the system's diagnostic accuracy against objective clinical criteria for identifying sensitization to specific allergens in daily practice of allergy clinics. Using both the automated microfluidic-based immunoassay system (BioIC and ImmunoCAP, we measured sIgE in serum samples from 212 children who visited allergic clinics in two medical centers. Outcomes of skin prick tests (SPT) served as the clinical comparison method. The assay results of targeted allergen of BioIC have a good correlation with ImmunoCAP in the diagnosis of allergen sensitivity by patients' clinical history. When comparing the test results of the sIgE against overall allergens, in either two tests among the three assays performed showed high percentage of agreement between BioIC and ImmunoCAP (77.8%, 95% CI: 72-83.3%) but not with SPT (BioIC 64.9%, 95% CI: 58-72%; ImmunoCAP 67.5%, 95% CI: 61-74%). Using ROC analysis and SPT as quasi-standard, BioIC and ImmunoCAP have nearly the same performance of sensitivity and specificity in the confirmation of SPT results. The total and within one-class agreements of each allergen test result between BioIC and ImmunoCAP ranged between 55.2% and 99.5% with an overall average of 80.9%. Laboratory testing for sIgE can be performed on a fully automated, microfluidic cartridge system with advantages of low sample volume, simultaneously tested allergens, and with diagnostic accuracy for representative allergens equivalent to the semi-automated CAP technology.
我们的目的是评估一种自动化微流控免疫分析系统测量血清过敏原特异性 IgE(sIgE)的性能,该系统基于已建立的体外检测方法,并评估该系统在识别过敏诊所日常实践中对特定过敏原致敏的临床标准方面的诊断准确性。使用自动化微流控基于免疫分析系统(BioIC 和 ImmunoCAP),我们测量了来自 212 名儿童的血清样本中的 sIgE,这些儿童来自两个医疗中心的过敏诊所。皮肤点刺试验(SPT)的结果作为临床比较方法。通过患者的临床病史,BioIC 的目标过敏原的检测结果与 ImmunoCAP 在过敏原敏感性的诊断中具有良好的相关性。当比较针对总体过敏原的 sIgE 检测结果时,在三个检测中进行的两个检测之间,BioIC 和 ImmunoCAP 之间显示出较高的一致性百分比(77.8%,95%CI:72-83.3%),但与 SPT 不一致(BioIC 64.9%,95%CI:58-72%;ImmunoCAP 67.5%,95%CI:61-74%)。使用 ROC 分析和 SPT 作为准标准,BioIC 和 ImmunoCAP 在确认 SPT 结果方面具有几乎相同的敏感性和特异性。BioIC 和 ImmunoCAP 之间每个过敏原检测结果的总一致性和同一类别内的一致性在 55.2%到 99.5%之间,总体平均为 80.9%。sIgE 的实验室检测可以在全自动、微流控卡盒系统上进行,具有样本量少、同时检测过敏原以及对代表性过敏原具有与半自动 CAP 技术相当的诊断准确性等优点。