University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Am J Infect Control. 2010 Sep;38(7):509-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.10.007. Epub 2010 Feb 21.
The use of electronic surveillance systems (ESSs) is gradually increasing in infection prevention and control programs. Little is known about the characteristics of hospitals that have a ESS, user satisfaction with ESSs, and organizational support for implementation of ESSs.
A total of 350 acute care hospitals in California were invited to participate in a Web-based survey; 207 hospitals (59%) agreed to participate. The survey included a description of infection prevention and control department staff, where and how they spent their time, a measure of organizational support for infection prevention and control, and reported experience with ESSs.
Only 23% (44/192) of responding infection prevention and control departments had an ESS. No statistically significant difference was seen in how and where infection preventionists (IPs) who used an ESS and those who did not spend their time. The 2 significant predictors of whether an ESS was present were score on the Organizational Support Scale (odds ratio [OR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.18) and hospital bed size (OR, 1.004; 95% CI, 1.00-1.007). Organizational support also was positively correlated with IP satisfaction with the ESS, as measured on the Computer Usability Scale (P = .02).
Despite evidence that such systems may improve efficiency of data collection and potentially improve patient outcomes, ESSs remain relatively uncommon in infection prevention and control programs. Based on our findings, organizational support appears to be a major predictor of the presence, use, and satisfaction with ESSs in infection prevention and control programs.
电子监控系统(ESS)在感染预防和控制项目中的使用逐渐增加。但对于拥有 ESS 的医院的特点、用户对 ESS 的满意度以及对 ESS 实施的组织支持知之甚少。
加利福尼亚州共有 350 家急症护理医院受邀参与基于网络的调查;207 家医院(59%)同意参与。该调查包括感染预防和控制部门的员工描述、他们的工作地点和工作时间、感染预防和控制的组织支持措施以及 ESS 使用经验的报告。
只有 23%(44/192)的参与感染预防和控制部门拥有 ESS。使用 ESS 的感染预防人员(IP)和未使用 ESS 的 IP 在工作方式和工作地点上没有明显差异。ESS 是否存在的 2 个显著预测因素是组织支持量表得分(比值比[OR],1.10;95%置信区间[CI],1.02-1.18)和医院床位数(OR,1.004;95%CI,1.00-1.007)。组织支持与 IP 对 ESS 的满意度也呈正相关,这在计算机使用量表(P=.02)中得到了体现。
尽管有证据表明这些系统可以提高数据收集的效率,并有可能改善患者的治疗效果,但 ESS 在感染预防和控制项目中仍然相对少见。根据我们的发现,组织支持似乎是感染预防和控制项目中 ESS 的存在、使用和满意度的主要预测因素。