Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Indian J Pediatr. 2010 Mar;77(3):273-6. doi: 10.1007/s12098-010-0032-2. Epub 2010 Feb 22.
To report our experience before and after implementation of pediatric rapid response team (RRT) in pediatric wards of a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan.
An audit of RRT activity from December 2007 to August 2008 was conducted and reviewed patient diagnoses at the time of call placement, interventions done and post-intervention clinical outcomes. Clinical Outcomes in the nine months before RRT implementation were compared with those in the first operational nine months after RRT.
Eighty-three calls were generated during the post-intervention study period of 9-month (21 calls/1000 admissions). The median age of patients was 27 months; 37% calls were for infants. The majority of patients were under care of medical services (93% vs 7% under care of surgical services). Greater numbers of calls were made during 0800-1600 hours (45%). Respiratory issues were the most common reason for activation of RRT. Because of early interventions, majority (61%) of patients avoided unnecessary PICU stay and expenditure; only 17% required mechanical ventilation in PICU. The code rate per 1000 admissions decreased from 5.2 (pre-RRT) to 2.7 (post-RRT) (p=0.08; OR 1.88 (95%Cl 0.9-3.93). The mortality rate of patients admitted in PICU from wards decreased from 50% to 15% (p=0.25; OR 1.64 (95%Cl 0.63-4.29).
Our experience with implementation of RRT was associated with reduction in cardiorespiratory arrest, mortality and saved a lot of PICU resource utilization. It is an excellent patient-safety initiative especially in resource-constrained countries by bringing PICU reflexes outside the PICU.
报告我们在巴基斯坦一家三级护理医院的儿科病房实施儿科快速反应小组(RRT)前后的经验。
对 2007 年 12 月至 2008 年 8 月期间的 RRT 活动进行了审核,并回顾了呼叫时患者的诊断、所采取的干预措施以及干预后的临床结果。比较了 RRT 实施前的九个月和实施后的前九个月的临床结果。
在干预后研究期间的 9 个月中,共生成了 83 次呼叫(21 次/1000 次入院)。患者的中位年龄为 27 个月;37%的呼叫是为婴儿。大多数患者接受医疗服务的护理(93%比接受手术服务的护理的 7%)。更多的呼叫发生在 0800-1600 小时(45%)。呼吸问题是 RRT 激活的最常见原因。由于早期干预,大多数(61%)患者避免了不必要的 PICU 住院和费用;只有 17%的患者需要在 PICU 进行机械通气。每 1000 次入院的编码率从 RRT 前的 5.2 降至 RRT 后的 2.7(p=0.08;OR 1.88(95%Cl 0.9-3.93))。从病房转入 PICU 的患者的死亡率从 50%降至 15%(p=0.25;OR 1.64(95%Cl 0.63-4.29))。
我们实施 RRT 的经验与心肺骤停、死亡率的降低以及大量节省 PICU 资源的利用有关。这是一项卓越的患者安全举措,特别是在资源有限的国家,它将 PICU 的反应带到了 PICU 之外。