• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

快速反应系统作为一种患者安全策略的系统评价。

Rapid-response systems as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 5;158(5 Pt 2):417-25. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303051-00009.

DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303051-00009
PMID:23460099
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4695999/
Abstract

Rapid-response systems (RRSs) are a popular intervention in U.S. hospitals and are supported by accreditors and quality improvement organizations. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of these systems in acute care settings. A literature search was performed between 1 January 2000 through 30 October 2012 using PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies published in any language evaluating outcome changes that occurred after implementing an RRS and differences between groups using and not using an RRS (effectiveness) or describing methods used by RRSs (implementation) were reviewed. A single reviewer (checked by a second reviewer) abstracted data and rated study quality and strength of evidence. Moderate-strength evidence from a high-quality meta-analysis of 18 studies and 26 lower-quality before-and-after studies published after that meta-analysis showed that RRSs are associated with reduced rates of cardiorespiratory arrest outside of the intensive care unit and reduced mortality. Eighteen studies examining facilitators of and barriers to implementation suggested that the rate of use of RRSs could be improved.

摘要

快速反应系统(RRS)在美国医院中是一种很受欢迎的干预措施,受到认证机构和质量改进组织的支持。本综述的目的是评估这些系统在急性护理环境中的有效性和实施情况。使用 PubMed、PsycINFO、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库,于 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2012 年 10 月 30 日进行了文献检索。评估了实施 RRS 后发生的结果变化,并比较了使用和不使用 RRS 的组之间的差异(有效性),或描述 RRS 使用方法(实施)的研究。一位审查员(由第二位审查员检查)提取数据并评估研究质量和证据强度。高质量荟萃分析的 18 项研究和该荟萃分析之后发表的 26 项较低质量的前瞻性研究的中等强度证据表明,RRS 与减少重症监护病房外的心肺骤停发生率和降低死亡率相关。18 项研究检查了实施的促进因素和障碍,表明 RRS 的使用率可以提高。

相似文献

1
Rapid-response systems as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review.快速反应系统作为一种患者安全策略的系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 5;158(5 Pt 2):417-25. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303051-00009.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
4
Early warning systems and rapid response systems for the prevention of patient deterioration on acute adult hospital wards.急性成人病房患者恶化的预防用早期预警系统和快速反应系统。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 22;11(11):CD005529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005529.pub3.
5
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
6
Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients.改善医院住院患者抗生素处方行为的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 9;2(2):CD003543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4.
7
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
9
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
10
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.

引用本文的文献

1
The Epidemiology of Emergency Calls in a Tertiary Emergency Department for Admitted Patients: A TECOR Study.三级急诊科收治患者的急救电话流行病学:一项TECOR研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 10;13(14):1670. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141670.
2
Development, implementation, and evaluation of a rapid response system at a Nigerian teaching hospital, a novel idea in sub-Saharan Africa.尼日利亚一家教学医院快速反应系统的开发、实施与评估,这在撒哈拉以南非洲地区是一个新颖的想法。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 9;12:1583470. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1583470. eCollection 2025.
3
Assessing the Impact of the Rapid Response Team Training Program on the Performance Outcomes of First-Year Post-Graduate Residents During Rapid Response Codes.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical emergency teams are associated with reduced mortality across a major metropolitan health network after two years service: a retrospective study using government administrative data.一项使用政府行政数据的回顾性研究表明,医疗急救团队在服务两年后,与一个大型都市卫生网络中死亡率的降低相关。
Crit Care. 2012 Oct 29;16(5):R210. doi: 10.1186/cc11843.
2
Sustained effectiveness of a primary-team-based rapid response system.基于初级团队的快速反应系统的持续有效性。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Sep;40(9):2562-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318259007b.
3
What stops hospital clinical staff from following protocols? An analysis of the incidence and factors behind the failure of bedside clinical staff to activate the rapid response system in a multi-campus Australian metropolitan healthcare service.
评估快速反应团队培训计划对研究生一年级住院医师在快速反应代码期间绩效结果的影响。
Cureus. 2025 May 5;17(5):e83519. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83519. eCollection 2025 May.
4
The Role of Integrated Nursing Interventions in Traumatic Brain Injury Management in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Study.综合护理干预在急诊科创伤性脑损伤管理中的作用:一项回顾性研究。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025 May 26;21:769-780. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S512673. eCollection 2025.
5
Improving respiratory rate monitoring in general wards following implementation of a rapid response system: a quality improvement initiative.实施快速反应系统后改善普通病房的呼吸频率监测:一项质量改进举措。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Apr 9;14(2):e003218. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003218.
6
A national survey of Intensive Care Medicine Services in Portugal: where we are and the road ahead.葡萄牙重症医学服务全国性调查:我们所处的现状与前行之路
Crit Care Sci. 2025 Feb 10;37:e20250302. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250302. eCollection 2025.
7
Exploring the impact of age on the predictive power of the National Early Warning score (NEWS) 2, and long-term prognosis among patients reviewed by a Rapid Response Team: A prospective, multi-centre study.探讨年龄对国家早期预警评分(NEWS)2预测能力的影响,以及快速反应团队评估的患者的长期预后:一项前瞻性、多中心研究。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Dec 10;21:100839. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100839. eCollection 2025 Jan.
8
Efficacy of Early Warning Scores as the Prediction Tool for Detecting Patients With Acute Deterioration in a High Dependent Unit.早期预警评分作为预测高依赖病房急性病情恶化患者工具的有效性
Cureus. 2024 Oct 20;16(10):e71971. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71971. eCollection 2024 Oct.
9
Hospital nurses and physicians' experiences practicing patient safety work to recognize deteriorating patients: a qualitative study.医院护士和医生在识别病情恶化患者方面实施患者安全工作的经验:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 18;24(1):1429. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11908-x.
10
Health care workers' experiences of calling-for-help when taking care of critically ill patients in hospitals in Tanzania and Kenya.坦桑尼亚和肯尼亚医院中医护人员在照顾重症患者时寻求帮助的经历。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 17;24(1):821. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11254-y.
医院临床人员不遵守规程的原因是什么?对澳大利亚多校区大都市医疗服务机构床边临床人员未能启动快速反应系统的事件发生率及背后因素进行分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jul;21(7):569-75. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000692. Epub 2012 May 23.
4
Evaluating a new rapid response team: NP-led versus intensivist-led comparisons.评估一个新的快速反应团队:以护士主导与以重症医学专家主导的比较
AACN Adv Crit Care. 2012 Jan-Mar;23(1):32-42. doi: 10.1097/NCI.0b013e318240e2f9.
5
Timing and teamwork--an observational pilot study of patients referred to a Rapid Response Team with the aim of identifying factors amenable to re-design of a Rapid Response System.时机与团队合作——对被转至快速反应团队的患者进行的一项观察性初步研究,旨在确定可对快速反应系统进行重新设计的因素。
Resuscitation. 2012 Jun;83(6):782-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.12.019. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
6
Association between implementation of an intensivist-led medical emergency team and mortality.强化治疗医师主导的医疗急救团队的实施与死亡率之间的关系。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Feb;21(2):152-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000393. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
7
Reduction in hospital-wide mortality after implementation of a rapid response team: a long-term cohort study.快速反应团队实施后全院死亡率降低:一项长期队列研究。
Crit Care. 2011;15(6):R269. doi: 10.1186/cc10547. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
8
Four years' experience with a hospitalist-led medical emergency team: an interrupted time series.医院主导的医疗急救团队四年经验:一项中断时间序列研究。
J Hosp Med. 2012 Feb;7(2):98-103. doi: 10.1002/jhm.953. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
9
Understanding how rapid response systems may improve safety for the acutely ill patient: learning from the frontline.了解快速反应系统如何提高急性病患者的安全性:从一线学习。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Feb;21(2):135-44. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000147. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
10
Rapid-response teams.快速反应小组。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 14;365(2):139-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0910926.