Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
JAMA. 2010 Feb 24;303(8):763-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.167.
Studies suggest that many survivors of critical illness experience long-term cognitive impairment but have not included premorbid measures of cognitive functioning and have not evaluated risk for dementia associated with critical illness.
To determine whether decline in cognitive function was greater among older individuals who experienced acute care or critical illness hospitalizations relative to those not hospitalized and to determine whether the risk for incident dementia differed by these exposures.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Analysis of data from a prospective cohort study from 1994 through 2007 comprising 2929 individuals 65 years old and older without dementia at baseline residing in the community in the Seattle area and belonging to the Group Health Cooperative. Participants with 2 or more study visits were included, and those who had a hospitalization for a diagnosis of primary brain injury were censored at the time of hospitalization. Individuals were screened with the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) (score range, 0-100) every 2 years at follow-up visits, and those with a score less than 86 underwent a clinical examination for dementia.
Score on the CASI at follow-up study visits and incident dementia diagnosed in study participants, adjusted for baseline cognitive scores, age, and other risk factors.
During a mean (SD) follow-up of 6.1 (3.2) years, 1601 participants had no hospitalization, 1287 had 1 or more noncritical illness hospitalizations, and 41 had 1 or more critical illness hospitalizations. The CASI score was assessed more than 45 days after discharge for 94.3% of participants. Adjusted CASI scores averaged 1.01 points lower for visits following acute care illness hospitalization compared with follow-up visits not following any hospitalization (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.33 to -0.70; P < .001) and 2.14 points lower on average for visits following critical illness hospitalization (95% CI, -4.24 to -0.03; P = .047). There were 146 cases of dementia among those not hospitalized, 228 cases of dementia among those with 1 or more noncritical illness hospitalizations, and 5 cases of dementia among those with 1 or more critical illness hospitalizations. The adjusted hazard ratio for incident dementia was 1.4 following a noncritical illness hospitalization (95% CI, 1.1 to 1.7; P = .001) and 2.3 following a critical illness hospitalization (95% CI, 0.9 to 5.7; P = .09).
Among a cohort of older adults without dementia at baseline, those who experienced acute care hospitalization and critical illness hospitalization had a greater likelihood of cognitive decline compared with those who had no hospitalization. Noncritical illness hospitalization was significantly associated with the development of dementia.
研究表明,许多危重病患者会经历长期的认知障碍,但这些研究未纳入发病前的认知功能测量,也未评估与危重病相关的痴呆风险。
确定经历急性护理或重症监护病房住院的老年人与未住院者相比,认知功能下降是否更大,并确定这些暴露对新发痴呆症的风险是否存在差异。
设计、地点和参与者:对 1994 年至 2007 年期间进行的一项前瞻性队列研究的数据进行分析,该研究纳入了西雅图地区社区中 2929 名年龄在 65 岁及以上、基线时无痴呆且属于 Group Health Cooperative 的个体。纳入了有 2 次或更多次研究就诊的参与者,并对有 2 次或更多次因原发性脑损伤住院的患者进行了住院 censoring。在随访就诊时,参与者每隔 2 年用认知能力筛查工具(CASI)进行筛查(评分范围 0-100),评分低于 86 的患者进行痴呆临床检查。
在随访研究就诊时的 CASI 评分和研究参与者中诊断出的新发痴呆症,调整了基线认知评分、年龄和其他风险因素。
在平均(SD)6.1(3.2)年的随访中,1601 名参与者无住院治疗,1287 名参与者有 1 次或多次非重症疾病住院治疗,41 名参与者有 1 次或多次重症疾病住院治疗。94.3%的参与者在出院后 45 天以上进行了 CASI 评分评估。与未进行任何住院治疗的随访就诊相比,急性护理疾病住院治疗后的 CASI 评分平均降低 1.01 分(95%置信区间 [CI],-1.33 至 -0.70;P <.001),重症疾病住院治疗后平均降低 2.14 分(95% CI,-4.24 至 -0.03;P =.047)。在未住院的患者中,有 146 例痴呆病例,在有 1 次或多次非重症疾病住院的患者中有 228 例痴呆病例,在有 1 次或多次重症疾病住院的患者中有 5 例痴呆病例。非重症疾病住院治疗后的发病痴呆症的调整后危险比为 1.4(95% CI,1.1 至 1.7;P =.001),重症疾病住院治疗后的发病痴呆症的调整后危险比为 2.3(95% CI,0.9 至 5.7;P =.09)。
在无基线痴呆的老年队列中,与未住院者相比,经历急性护理住院和重症监护病房住院的患者认知能力下降的可能性更大。非重症疾病住院与痴呆的发生显著相关。