Suppr超能文献

一种针对胃肠道内镜的细菌生物膜清除效果的研究。

A study of the efficacy of bacterial biofilm cleanout for gastrointestinal endoscopes.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb 28;16(8):1019-24. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i8.1019.

Abstract

AIM

To compare the influence and clearance effect of enzymatic and non-enzymatic detergents against Escherichia coli (E. coli) biofilm on the inner surface of gastroscopes.

METHODS

Teflon tubes were incubated in a mixture of different detergents and E. coli culture (10(6) CFU/mL) for 72 h at 15 degrees C, and biofilms on the inner surface of the teflon tubes were analyzed by bacterial count and scanning electron microscopy. To evaluate the clearance effect of detergents, after biofilms were formed on the inner surface of Teflon tubes by 72 h lavage with E. coli culture, tubes were lavaged by enzymatic and non-enzymatic detergents at a speed of 250 mL/min, then biofilms on the inner surface were analyzed by bacterial count and scanning electron microscopy.

RESULTS

Non-enzymatic detergent had a better inhibition function on biofilm formation than enzymatic detergent as it reduced bacterial burden by 2.4 log compared with the control samples (P = 0.00). Inhibition function of enzymatic detergent was not significantly different to that of control samples and reduced bacterial burden by 0.2 log on average (P > 0.05). After lavaging at 250 mL/min for 3 min, no living bacteria were left in the tubes. Scanning electron microscopy observation showed biofilms became very loose by the high shear force effect.

CONCLUSION

Non-enzymatic detergent has a better inhibition effect on biofilm formation at room temperature. High speed pre-lavage and detergents are very important in temporal formed biofilm elimination.

摘要

目的

比较酶清洁剂和非酶清洁剂对胃内表面大肠杆菌(E. coli)生物膜的影响和清除效果。

方法

将特氟龙管置于不同清洁剂和 E. coli 培养物(10(6) CFU/mL)的混合物中,在 15°C 下孵育 72 小时,通过细菌计数和扫描电子显微镜分析特氟龙管内表面上的生物膜。为了评估清洁剂的清除效果,在特氟龙管内表面用 E. coli 培养物冲洗 72 小时形成生物膜后,用酶清洁剂和非酶清洁剂以 250 mL/min 的速度冲洗管,然后通过细菌计数和扫描电子显微镜分析管内表面的生物膜。

结果

非酶清洁剂对生物膜形成的抑制作用优于酶清洁剂,因为它使细菌负荷减少了 2.4 对数级,与对照样品相比(P = 0.00)。酶清洁剂的抑制作用与对照样品无显著差异,平均减少细菌负荷 0.2 对数级(P > 0.05)。以 250 mL/min 的速度冲洗 3 分钟后,管内没有活细菌。扫描电子显微镜观察显示,生物膜由于高剪切力的作用变得非常疏松。

结论

非酶清洁剂在室温下对生物膜形成有更好的抑制作用。高速预冲洗和清洁剂在临时形成的生物膜清除中非常重要。

相似文献

1
A study of the efficacy of bacterial biofilm cleanout for gastrointestinal endoscopes.
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb 28;16(8):1019-24. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i8.1019.
2
Evaluation of detergents and contact time on biofilm removal from flexible endoscopes.
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Sep;41(9):e89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.01.027. Epub 2013 May 8.
3
Removal of biofilm from endoscopes: evaluation of detergent efficiency.
Am J Infect Control. 2004 May;32(3):170-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2003.10.009.
4
Evaluation of two detergent-disinfectants and a detergent on a Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm formed within Tygon tubes.
J Hosp Infect. 2023 Oct;140:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.04.019. Epub 2023 Jul 23.
5
Efficacy of low-temperature plasma-activated gas disinfection against biofilm on contaminated GI endoscope channels.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jan;89(1):105-114. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.009. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
6
The effect of multiple cycles of contamination, detergent washing, and disinfection on the development of biofilm in endoscope tubing.
Am J Infect Control. 2009 Aug;37(6):470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.09.016. Epub 2009 Jan 19.
7
The truth and consequences of enzymatic detergents.
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2005 Sep-Oct;28(5):372-6. doi: 10.1097/00001610-200509000-00003.
8
Contribution of usage to endoscope working channel damage and bacterial contamination.
J Hosp Infect. 2020 Jun;105(2):176-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.03.007. Epub 2020 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

4
Antimicrobial Pressure of Ciprofloxacin and Gentamicin on Biofilm Development by an Endoscope-Isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
ISRN Biotechnol. 2012 Aug 28;2013:178646. doi: 10.5402/2013/178646. eCollection 2013.
5
Is peracetic acid suitable for the cleaning step of reprocessing flexible endoscopes?
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Sep 16;6(9):390-406. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i9.390.
6
Using surface plasmon resonance imaging to study bacterial biofilms.
Biomicrofluidics. 2014 Mar 5;8(2):021804. doi: 10.1063/1.4867739. eCollection 2014 Mar.
7
Transmission of infection by flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy.
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013 Apr;26(2):231-54. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00085-12.

本文引用的文献

1
Using an efficient biofilm detaching agent: an essential step for the improvement of endoscope reprocessing protocols.
J Hosp Infect. 2006 Oct;64(2):136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.06.011. Epub 2006 Aug 21.
2
A new procedure allowing the complete removal and prevention of hemodialysis biofilms.
Blood Purif. 2005;23(5):339-48. doi: 10.1159/000086870. Epub 2005 Jul 7.
3
Recent advances in epidemiology and prevention of gastrointestinal endoscopy related infections.
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2005 Aug;18(4):326-30. doi: 10.1097/01.qco.0000171925.47452.8f.
4
5
Removal of biofilm from endoscopes: evaluation of detergent efficiency.
Am J Infect Control. 2004 May;32(3):170-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2003.10.009.
6
Catheter-associated infections: pathogenesis affects prevention.
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Apr 26;164(8):842-50. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.8.842.
7
Test models to determine cleaning efficacy with different types of bioburden and its clinical correlation.
J Hosp Infect. 2004 Apr;56 Suppl 2:S44-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2003.12.029.
8
Detection of subclinical infection in significant breast implant capsules.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Apr 15;111(5):1605-11. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000054768.14922.44.
10
Water, water everywhere nor any a sterile drop to rinse your endoscope.
J Hosp Infect. 2002 Aug;51(4):256-61. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2002.1235.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验