Suppr超能文献

INTERCEPT泡沫喷雾处理后内窥镜的微生物监测结果:新加坡的一项准实验性初步研究。

Microbiological surveillance result of endoscopes after INTERCEPT Foam Spray: a quasi-experimental pilot study in Singapore.

作者信息

Wang Caihong, Zhang Rong, Fan Ruhui, Low Jiewen, Du Ruochen, Ma Xueyun, Cai Congcong

机构信息

Endoscopy Centre, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

Biostatics Unit, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Clin Endosc. 2024 Nov;57(6):821-831. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.030. Epub 2024 Nov 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study aimed to assess the impact of INTERCEPT Foam Spray (IFS) application on delayed endoscope reprocessing through microbiological surveillance culture (MSC).

METHODS

A quasi-experimental, matched-comparison pilot study was conducted using gastrointestinal endoscopy. IFS was applied to the endoscopes after precleaning and before reprocessing the next day. An equal number of endoscopes, matched by endoscope type, were subjected to routine reprocessing. The MSC were subjected to high-level disinfection to detect any contamination. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test (categorical data) and Student t-test (continuous data).

RESULTS

In total, 150 MSCs were collected from 42 endoscopes. Positive MSCs were observed in 4.0% (4/75) of the sprayed group and 1.3% (1/75) of the control group (95% confidence interval, 30.34-0.31; p>0.05), all of which were contributed by colonoscopes. Colonoscope were more prone to positive MSC (mean difference in percentage, p<0.05). Mean spraying hours were not associated with detected growth (11.7% vs. 13.6%; 95% confidence interval, 1.43 to -5.27; p>0.05), with environmental and skin flora being the primary contaminants.

CONCLUSIONS

IFS may be applied when delayed endoscope processing is necessary, but with caution when applied to colonoscopes. However, further research is warranted to verify the result.

摘要

背景/目的:本研究旨在通过微生物监测培养(MSC)评估应用INTERCEPT泡沫喷雾(IFS)对内镜延迟再处理的影响。

方法

采用胃肠内镜进行了一项准实验性、匹配比较的前瞻性研究。在预清洁后且于次日再处理前,将IFS应用于内镜。选择同等数量、按内镜类型匹配的内镜进行常规再处理。对MSC进行高水平消毒以检测是否存在污染。使用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验(分类数据)以及学生t检验(连续数据)对数据进行分析。

结果

总共从42条内镜收集了150份MSC。喷雾组阳性MSC的比例为4.0%(4/75),对照组为1.3%(1/75)(95%置信区间,30.34 - 0.31;p>0.05),所有阳性均来自结肠镜。结肠镜更容易出现阳性MSC(百分比平均差异,p<0.05)。平均喷雾时长与检测到的细菌生长无关(11.7%对13.6%;95%置信区间,1.43至 - 5.27;p>0.05),主要污染物为环境菌群和皮肤菌群。

结论

在有必要延迟内镜处理时可应用IFS,但应用于结肠镜时需谨慎。然而,需要进一步研究以验证该结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a668/11637663/62d0a18ce8db/ce-2024-030f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验