Departments of Kinesiology and Pediatrics & Human Development, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2010 Jan 28;2:8. doi: 10.1186/1758-5996-2-8.
The primary purpose of this study was to examine the construct validity of a continuous metabolic syndrome score (cMetS) in children. The secondary purpose was to identify a cutpoint value(s) for an adverse cMetS based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
378 children aged 7 to 9 years were assessed for the metabolic syndrome which was determined by age-modified cutpoints. High-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, the homeostasis assessment model of insulin resistance, mean arterial pressure, and waist circumference were used to create a cMetS for each subject.
About half of the subjects did not possess any risk factors while about 5% possessed the metabolic syndrome. There was a graded relationship between the cMetS and the number of adverse risk factors. The cMetS was lowest in the group with no adverse risk factors (-1.59 +/- 1.76) and highest in those possessing the metabolic syndrome (> or =3 risk factors) (7.05 +/- 2.73). The cutoff level yielding the maximal sensitivity and specificity for predicting the presence of the metabolic syndrome was a cMetS of 3.72 (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 93.9%, and the area of the curve = 0.978 (0.957-0.990, 95% confidence intervals).
The results demonstrate the construct validity for the cMetS in children. Since there are several drawbacks to identifying a single cut-point value for the cMetS based on this sample, we urge researchers to use the approach herein to validate and create a cMetS that is specific to their study population.
本研究的主要目的是检验儿童连续代谢综合征评分(cMetS)的结构效度。次要目的是通过接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定不良 cMetS 的切点值。
对 378 名 7 至 9 岁的儿童进行代谢综合征评估,采用年龄修正切点来确定代谢综合征。高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、甘油三酯、胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估、平均动脉压和腰围用于为每个受试者创建 cMetS。
大约一半的受试者没有任何危险因素,而大约 5%的受试者患有代谢综合征。cMetS 与不良危险因素的数量之间存在梯度关系。cMetS 在没有不良危险因素的组中最低(-1.59 ± 1.76),在患有代谢综合征的组中最高(≥3 个危险因素)(7.05 ± 2.73)。预测代谢综合征存在的最大敏感性和特异性的截断值为 cMetS 的 3.72(敏感性=100%,特异性=93.9%,曲线下面积为 0.978(0.957-0.990,95%置信区间)。
结果表明 cMetS 在儿童中的结构效度。由于根据该样本确定 cMetS 的单一切点值存在一些缺点,因此我们敦促研究人员使用本文所述的方法来验证并创建适合其研究人群的 cMetS。