• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在基层医疗中提供 WISE(全面系统促进自我管理参与)培训包:从形成性评价中学习。

Delivering the WISE (Whole Systems Informing Self-Management Engagement) training package in primary care: learning from formative evaluation.

机构信息

National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2010 Jan 29;5:7. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-7.

DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-5-7
PMID:20181050
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2841580/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The WISE (Whole System Informing Self-management Engagement) approach encompasses creating, finding, and implementing appropriate self-care support for people with long-term conditions. A training package for primary care to introduce the approach was developed and underwent formative evaluation. This entailed exploring the acceptability of the WISE approach and its effectiveness in changing communication within consultations. The study aimed to refine the patient, practitioner, and patient level components of the WISE approach and translate the principles of WISE into an operational intervention deliverable through National Health Service training methods.

METHODS

Normalisation Process Theory provided a framework for development of the intervention. Practices were recruited from an inner city Primary Care Trust in NW England. All practice staff were expected to attend two afternoon training sessions. The training sessions were observed by members of the training team. Post-training audio recordings of consultations from each general practitioner and nurse in the practices were transcribed and read to provide a narrative overview of the incorporation of WISE skills and tools into consultations. Face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff post-training.

RESULTS

Two practices out of 14 deemed eligible agreed to take part. Each practice attended two sessions, although a third session on consultation skills training was needed for one practice. Fifty-four post-training consultations were recorded from 15 clinicians. Two members of staff were interviewed at each practice. Significant elements of the training form and methods of delivery fitted contemporary practice. There were logistical problems in getting a whole practice to attend both sessions, and administrative staff founds some sections irrelevant. Clinicians reported problems incorporating some of the tools developed for WISE, and this was confirmed in the overview of consultations, with limited overt use of WISE tools and missed opportunities to address patients' self-management needs.

CONCLUSIONS

The formative evaluation approach and attention to normalisation process theory allowed the training team to make adjustments to content and delivery and ensure appropriate staff attended each session. The content of the course was simplified and focussed more clearly on operationalising the WISE approach. The patient arm of the approach was strengthened by raising expectations of a change in approach to self-care support by their practice.

摘要

背景

WISE(全面系统促进自我管理参与)方法包括为患有长期疾病的人创建、寻找和实施适当的自我护理支持。为向初级保健引入该方法开发了一个培训包,并进行了形成性评估。这需要探索 WISE 方法的可接受性及其在改变咨询中的沟通方面的有效性。该研究旨在完善 WISE 方法的患者、从业者和患者层面的内容,并将 WISE 的原则转化为通过国民保健制度培训方法提供的可操作干预措施。

方法

正常化进程理论为干预措施的制定提供了框架。从英格兰西北部一个内城的初级保健信托中招募了实践。所有实践工作人员都预计要参加两个下午的培训课程。培训课程由培训团队的成员进行观察。对实践中每位全科医生和护士的咨询后的音频记录进行转录并阅读,以提供将 WISE 技能和工具纳入咨询的叙述性概述。培训后,对工作人员进行了面对面的半结构化访谈。

结果

14 个实践中有 2 个符合条件并同意参加。每个实践都参加了两个课程,但有一个实践需要进行第三次关于咨询技巧培训的课程。从 15 名临床医生那里记录了 54 次培训后的咨询。在每个实践中采访了两名工作人员。培训形式和交付方法的重要内容符合当代实践。让整个实践参加两个课程存在后勤问题,行政人员发现有些部分不相关。临床医生报告说,在整合为 WISE 开发的一些工具时遇到了问题,这在咨询概述中得到了证实,WISE 工具的明显使用有限,错过了解决患者自我管理需求的机会。

结论

形成性评估方法和对正常化进程理论的关注使培训团队能够调整内容和交付方式,并确保适当的工作人员参加每个课程。课程内容简化了,更加明确地侧重于实施 WISE 方法。通过提高他们的实践对自我护理支持方法改变的期望,加强了方法的患者方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ce/2841580/a8f2b439bf2e/1748-5908-5-7-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ce/2841580/8ff0db7f8fd8/1748-5908-5-7-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ce/2841580/a8f2b439bf2e/1748-5908-5-7-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ce/2841580/8ff0db7f8fd8/1748-5908-5-7-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ce/2841580/a8f2b439bf2e/1748-5908-5-7-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Delivering the WISE (Whole Systems Informing Self-Management Engagement) training package in primary care: learning from formative evaluation.在基层医疗中提供 WISE(全面系统促进自我管理参与)培训包:从形成性评价中学习。
Implement Sci. 2010 Jan 29;5:7. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-7.
2
Implementing, embedding and integrating self-management support tools for people with long-term conditions in primary care nursing: a qualitative study.在初级护理中为慢性病患者实施、嵌入和整合自我管理支持工具:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Aug;51(8):1103-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.11.008. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
3
Implementation of a self-management support approach (WISE) across a health system: a process evaluation explaining what did and did not work for organisations, clinicians and patients.在一个卫生系统中实施自我管理支持方法(WISE):一项过程评估,解释该方法对组织、临床医生和患者的成效与不足。
Implement Sci. 2014 Oct 21;9:129. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0129-5.
4
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
5
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
6
The acceptability to primary care staff of a multidisciplinary training package on acute back pain guidelines.初级护理人员对急性背痛指南多学科培训包的接受程度。
Fam Pract. 2002 Oct;19(5):511-5. doi: 10.1093/fampra/19.5.511.
7
Public engagement to refine a whole-school intervention to promote adolescent mental health.公众参与完善全校性干预措施以促进青少年心理健康。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Dec 4:1-22. doi: 10.3310/JWGT4863.
8
Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study.当前在英格兰促进获取数字国民保健服务初级保健服务的经验和未来潜力:Di-Facto 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(32):1-197. doi: 10.3310/JKYT5803.
9
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
10
Implementing online consultations in primary care: a mixed-method evaluation extending normalisation process theory through service co-production.在初级医疗保健中实施在线咨询:一项通过服务共同生产扩展规范化过程理论的混合方法评估。
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 19;8(3):e019966. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019966.

引用本文的文献

1
Using normalisation process theory (NPT) to explore implementation of the maternal perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) policy in Uganda: a reflection.利用常态化进程理论(NPT)探讨乌干达母婴围产死亡监测与应对(MPDSR)政策的实施:反思。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Nov 4;22(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01191-x.
2
Supporting translation of research evidence into practice-the use of Normalisation Process Theory to assess and inform implementation within randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.支持研究证据转化为实践——使用规范进程理论评估和为随机对照试验中的实施提供信息:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2023 Oct 27;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01311-1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Practice nurses and the effects of the new general practitioner contract in the English National Health Service: the extension of a professional project?执业护士与英国国民医疗服务体系中新的全科医生合同的影响:一个专业项目的扩展?
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Apr;68(7):1206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.039. Epub 2009 Feb 28.
2
Developing guided self-help for depression using the Medical Research Council complex interventions framework: a description of the modelling phase and results of an exploratory randomised controlled trial.运用医学研究理事会复杂干预框架开发抑郁症的引导式自助干预措施:探索性随机对照试验的建模阶段描述及结果
BMC Psychiatry. 2008 Nov 24;8:91. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-8-91.
3
Implementation of physical activity interventions for people with inflammatory arthritis: an overview and future recommendations.
针对炎症性关节炎患者的体育活动干预措施的实施:概述与未来建议。
Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2023 Jan 24;7(1):rkac094. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkac094. eCollection 2023.
4
Effectiveness of Shared Decision-making Training Programs for Health Care Professionals Using Reflexivity Strategies: Secondary Analysis of a Systematic Review.使用反思策略的医疗保健专业人员共同决策培训项目的有效性:一项系统评价的二次分析
JMIR Med Educ. 2022 Dec 7;8(4):e42033. doi: 10.2196/42033.
5
Making change last? Exploring the value of sustainability approaches in healthcare: a scoping review.让变革持续?探索医疗保健领域可持续发展方法的价值:一项范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Oct 13;18(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00601-0.
6
Acceptability of a cessation intervention for pregnant smokers: a qualitative study guided by Normalization Process Theory.一项基于正常化进程理论的定性研究:针对孕妇吸烟者的戒烟干预措施的可接受性。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 6;20(1):1512. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09608-2.
7
Application of normalisation process theory in understanding implementation processes in primary care settings in the UK: a systematic review.规范化进程理论在理解英国初级保健环境中实施过程中的应用:系统评价。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Mar 16;21(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01107-y.
8
Can implementation failure or intervention failure explain the result of the 3D multimorbidity trial in general practice: mixed-methods process evaluation.实施失败或干预失败能否解释全科医疗中3D共病试验的结果:混合方法过程评估
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 6;9(11):e031438. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031438.
9
Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice.帮助患者自助:初级卫生保健实践中自我管理支持策略的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8):e0220116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220116. eCollection 2019.
10
Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 1 - development of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT).优化复杂干预措施的规范化:第 1 部分 - 根据规范化进程理论(NPT)开发评估实施工作的 NoMAD 工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 15;18(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0590-y.
Biomedicine, holism and general medical practice: responses to the 2004 General Practitioner contract.
生物医学、整体论与全科医疗实践:对2004年全科医生合同的回应
Sociol Health Illn. 2008 Jul;30(5):788-803. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01081.x. Epub 2008 Apr 28.
4
Practice nurses and the facilitation of self-management in primary care.执业护士与基层医疗中自我管理的促进
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(2):191-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04585.x.
5
Mentoring nurses in familial cancer risk assessment and counseling: lessons learned from a formative evaluation.指导护士进行家族性癌症风险评估与咨询:形成性评估的经验教训
J Genet Couns. 2008 Apr;17(2):196-207. doi: 10.1007/s10897-007-9140-1. Epub 2008 Jan 26.
6
Support for self care for patients with chronic disease.对慢性病患者自我护理的支持。
BMJ. 2007 Nov 10;335(7627):968-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39372.540903.94.
7
Effectiveness of a computerized decision aid in primary care on decision making and quality of life in menorrhagia: results of the MENTIP randomized controlled trial.初级保健中计算机化决策辅助工具对月经过多患者决策制定和生活质量的有效性:MENTIP随机对照试验的结果
Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):575-84. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07306785. Epub 2007 Sep 26.
8
A model for the development of genetics education programs for health professionals.针对卫生专业人员的遗传学教育项目开发模型。
Genet Med. 2007 Jul;9(7):451-7. doi: 10.1097/gim.0b013e3180a6eb69.
9
Quality of primary care in England with the introduction of pay for performance.引入绩效薪酬后英国初级医疗保健的质量
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 12;357(2):181-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr065990.
10
How effective are expert patient (lay led) education programmes for chronic disease?由患者专家(非专业人员主导)开展的慢性病教育项目效果如何?
BMJ. 2007 Jun 16;334(7606):1254-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39227.698785.47.