• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用明确的综合指标制定框架来改进基准测试:以儿科护理质量为例。

Improving benchmarking by using an explicit framework for the development of composite indicators: an example using pediatric quality of care.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2010 Feb 9;5:13. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-13.

DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-5-13
PMID:20181129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2831823/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The measurement of healthcare provider performance is becoming more widespread. Physicians have been guarded about performance measurement, in part because the methodology for comparative measurement of care quality is underdeveloped. Comprehensive quality improvement will require comprehensive measurement, implying the aggregation of multiple quality metrics into composite indicators.

OBJECTIVE

To present a conceptual framework to develop comprehensive, robust, and transparent composite indicators of pediatric care quality, and to highlight aspects specific to quality measurement in children.

METHODS

We reviewed the scientific literature on composite indicator development, health systems, and quality measurement in the pediatric healthcare setting. Frameworks were selected for explicitness and applicability to a hospital-based measurement system.

RESULTS

We synthesized various frameworks into a comprehensive model for the development of composite indicators of quality of care. Among its key premises, the model proposes identifying structural, process, and outcome metrics for each of the Institute of Medicine's six domains of quality (safety, effectiveness, efficiency, patient-centeredness, timeliness, and equity) and presents a step-by-step framework for embedding the quality of care measurement model into composite indicator development.

CONCLUSIONS

The framework presented offers researchers an explicit path to composite indicator development. Without a scientifically robust and comprehensive approach to measurement of the quality of healthcare, performance measurement will ultimately fail to achieve its quality improvement goals.

摘要

背景

医疗服务提供者的绩效衡量正变得越来越普遍。由于医疗质量的比较衡量方法尚不成熟,医生对绩效衡量持谨慎态度。全面的质量改进需要全面的衡量,这意味着将多个质量指标综合为综合指标。

目的

提出一个概念框架,以开发全面、稳健和透明的儿科护理质量综合指标,并强调儿童质量衡量的特定方面。

方法

我们回顾了关于综合指标制定、卫生系统以及儿科医疗保健环境中质量衡量的科学文献。选择了框架以明确性和对基于医院的衡量系统的适用性。

结果

我们将各种框架综合为一个全面的护理质量综合指标制定模型。该模型的主要前提包括为医学研究所的六个质量领域(安全性、有效性、效率、以患者为中心、及时性和公平性)中的每一个确定结构、过程和结果指标,并提出了一个将护理质量衡量模型嵌入综合指标制定的逐步框架。

结论

所提出的框架为研究人员提供了一个明确的综合指标制定路径。如果没有对医疗保健质量进行科学稳健和全面的衡量方法,绩效衡量最终将无法实现其质量改进目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2210/2831823/3253492a0993/1748-5908-5-13-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2210/2831823/3253492a0993/1748-5908-5-13-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2210/2831823/3253492a0993/1748-5908-5-13-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving benchmarking by using an explicit framework for the development of composite indicators: an example using pediatric quality of care.利用明确的综合指标制定框架来改进基准测试:以儿科护理质量为例。
Implement Sci. 2010 Feb 9;5:13. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-13.
2
3
Methods to derive composite indicators used for quality and safety measurement and monitoring in healthcare: a scoping review protocol.用于医疗保健质量和安全测量与监测的综合指标制定方法:范围综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 14;13(7):e071382. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071382.
4
[Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].葡萄牙国民医疗服务体系中的效率与质量:评估方法
Acta Med Port. 2008 Sep-Oct;21(5):397-410. Epub 2009 Jan 16.
5
Better Measurement for Performance Improvement in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: The Primary Health Care Performance Initiative (PHCPI) Experience of Conceptual Framework Development and Indicator Selection.低收入和中等收入国家改善绩效的更好衡量方法:初级卫生保健绩效倡议(PHCPI)概念框架制定和指标选择的经验
Milbank Q. 2017 Dec;95(4):836-883. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12301.
6
EMS Quality Improvement Programs急救医疗服务质量改进项目
7
Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework.综合患者、临床和系统视角评估医疗保健绩效:一个综合的测量框架。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 8;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4807-5.
8
Quality measures for children's health care.儿童医疗保健质量指标
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):199-209.
9
OECD Health Care Quality Indicator Project. The expert panel on primary care prevention and health promotion.经济合作与发展组织医疗保健质量指标项目。初级保健预防与健康促进专家小组。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2006 Sep;18 Suppl 1:21-5. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzl021.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Pilot Testing of PrOFILE-ST: A Pediatric Surgical Oncology Capacity and Quality Assessment Tool for Resource-Limited Settings.PrOFILE-ST的开发与试点测试:一种用于资源有限环境的儿科外科肿瘤学能力与质量评估工具
Cancer Med. 2025 Aug;14(15):e71122. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71122.
2
Assessment of quality of maternal and newborn care and its determinants: a national study of primary health care facilities in Nigeria.孕产妇和新生儿护理质量及其决定因素的评估:尼日利亚初级卫生保健机构的一项全国性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):921. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12957-6.
3
Methods to derive composite indicators used for quality and safety measurement and monitoring in healthcare: a scoping review protocol.

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-analysis: audit and feedback features impact effectiveness on care quality.荟萃分析:审核与反馈特征对医疗质量的有效性产生影响。
Med Care. 2009 Mar;47(3):356-63. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181893f6b.
2
Quality of life of formerly preterm and very low birth weight infants from preschool age to adulthood: a systematic review.早产及极低出生体重儿从学龄前到成年期的生活质量:一项系统综述
Pediatrics. 2008 Feb;121(2):e366-76. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0169.
3
Correlations among measures of quality in HIV care in the United States: cross sectional study.
用于医疗保健质量和安全测量与监测的综合指标制定方法:范围综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 14;13(7):e071382. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071382.
4
Development and pilot testing of PROACTIVE: A pediatric onco-critical care capacity and quality assessment tool for resource-limited settings.PROACTIVE 的制定和初步测试:一种用于资源有限环境的儿科肿瘤危重病护理能力和质量评估工具。
Cancer Med. 2023 Mar;12(5):6270-6282. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5395. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
5
Concordance of Hospital Ranks and Category Ratings Using the Current Technical Specification of US Hospital Star Ratings and Reasonable Alternative Specifications.使用美国医院星级评定现行技术规范和合理替代规范的医院等级和类别评级的一致性。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 May 13;3(5):e221006. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1006. eCollection 2022 May.
6
Handling missing data in a composite outcome with partially observed components: simulation study based on clustered paediatric routine data.处理具有部分观测组件的复合结局中的缺失数据:基于聚类儿科常规数据的模拟研究
J Appl Stat. 2021 Mar 17;49(9):2389-2402. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2021.1895087. eCollection 2022.
7
Measuring quality of care in moderate and late preterm infants.测量中晚期早产儿的护理质量。
J Perinatol. 2022 Oct;42(10):1294-1300. doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01377-7. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
8
TIMER: A Clinical Study of Energy Restriction in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.TIMER:妊娠期糖尿病妇女能量限制的临床研究。
Nutrients. 2021 Jul 18;13(7):2457. doi: 10.3390/nu13072457.
9
Development and testing of a composite index to monitor the continuum of maternal health service delivery at provincial and district level in South Africa.开发和测试南非省级和地区级孕产妇卫生服务提供情况连续监测综合指数。
PLoS One. 2021 May 25;16(5):e0252182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252182. eCollection 2021.
10
Evaluating the implementation of the SWITCH® school wellness intervention and capacity-building process through multiple methods.通过多种方法评估 SWITCH® 学校健康干预和能力建设过程的实施情况。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Dec 11;17(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01070-y.
美国艾滋病护理质量指标之间的相关性:横断面研究
BMJ. 2007 Nov 24;335(7629):1085. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39364.520278.55. Epub 2007 Oct 29.
4
Pay for performance is growing up.绩效薪酬正在逐渐成熟。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Jul;161(7):713-4. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.7.713.
5
Pay-for-performance in pediatrics: proceed with caution.儿科领域的按绩效付费:需谨慎行事。
Pediatrics. 2007 Jul;120(1):186-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1158.
6
Physician attitudes toward pay-for-quality programs: perspectives from the front line.医生对质量付费项目的态度:一线视角
Med Care Res Rev. 2007 Jun;64(3):331-43. doi: 10.1177/1077558707300091.
7
Implementing pay-for-performance in the neonatal intensive care unit.在新生儿重症监护病房实施按绩效付费制度。
Pediatrics. 2007 May;119(5):975-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1565.
8
Comparative analysis of alcohol control policies in 30 countries.30个国家酒精控制政策的比较分析。
PLoS Med. 2007 Apr;4(4):e151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040151.
9
General internists' views on pay-for-performance and public reporting of quality scores: a national survey.普通内科医生对按绩效付费及质量评分公开报告的看法:一项全国性调查。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Mar-Apr;26(2):492-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.492.
10
All-or-nothing treatment targets make bad performance measures.全或无的治疗目标并非良好的绩效衡量标准。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Mar;13(3):126-8.