Karasz Alison, Garcia Nerina, Ferri Lucia
Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center.
J Cross Cult Psychol. 2009 Nov 1;40(6):1041-1059. doi: 10.1177/0022022109348782.
Conventional psychiatric treatment models are based on a biopsychiatric model of depression. A plausible explanation for low rates of depression treatment utilization among ethnic minorities and the poor is that members of these communities do not share the cultural assumptions underlying the biopsychiatric model. The study examined conceptual models of depression among depressed patients from various ethnic groups, focusing on the degree to which patients' conceptual models 'matched' a biopsychiatric model of depression. The sample included 74 primary care patients from three ethnic groups screening positive for depression. We administered qualitative interviews assessing patients' conceptual representations of depression. The analysis proceeded in two phases. The first phase involved a strategy called 'quantitizing' the qualitative data. A rating scheme was developed and applied to the data by a rater blind to study hypotheses. The data was subjected to statistical analyses. The second phase of the analysis involved the analysis of thematic data using standard qualitative techniques. Study hypotheses were largely supported. The qualitative analysis provided a detailed picture of primary care patients' conceptual models of depression and suggested interesting directions for future research.
传统的精神科治疗模式基于抑郁症的生物精神病学模型。少数民族和贫困人口中抑郁症治疗利用率较低的一个合理原因是,这些群体的成员并不认同生物精神病学模型背后的文化假设。该研究考察了来自不同种族的抑郁症患者对抑郁症的概念模型,重点关注患者的概念模型与抑郁症生物精神病学模型的“匹配”程度。样本包括74名来自三个种族且抑郁症筛查呈阳性的初级保健患者。我们进行了定性访谈,以评估患者对抑郁症的概念性认知。分析分两个阶段进行。第一阶段涉及一种名为“量化”定性数据的策略。制定了一个评分方案,并由对研究假设不知情的评分者应用于数据。对数据进行了统计分析。分析的第二阶段涉及使用标准定性技术对主题数据进行分析。研究假设在很大程度上得到了支持。定性分析提供了初级保健患者抑郁症概念模型的详细情况,并为未来研究指明了有趣的方向。