Suppr超能文献

前瞻性对比研究磁共振胰胆管成像中阴性口服对比剂的应用。

Prospective comparative study of negative oral contrast agents for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Radiol. 2010 Feb;28(2):117-22. doi: 10.1007/s11604-009-0395-3. Epub 2010 Feb 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare prospectively the image quality of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) using manganese chloride tetrahydrate (Bothdel Oral Solution 10) (MCT), a new negative oral contrast agent; ferric ammonium citrate (FerriSeltz powder 20%) (FAC); and no agent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MRCP images (TE 970 ms) of patients administered MCT (n = 19) or FAC (n = 20) at random, and 18 patients without an agent were evaluated. The subjective image quality of the overall, extrahepatic bile duct, and pancreatic duct and the degree of elimination of gastrointestinal fluid scored by two radiologists blinded to information regarding the agent were compared using Mann-Whitney's U-test.

RESULTS

The degrees of elimination of gastroduodenal fluid of MCT and FAC were significantly better than those without an agent (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01). The subjective image quality of MCT of the overall and extrahepatic bile duct were significantly better, although no significant differences for FAC were observed compared with those without an agent (P < 0.01 and P = 0.21, P = 0.02 and P = 0.16). There were no significant differences for the pancreatic duct (P = 0.12 and P = 0.19), nor were there any significant differences in the evaluations between MCT and FAC (P = 0.19-0.98).

CONCLUSION

MCT has shown performance comparable to that of conventional FAC in terms of pancreatic and biliary depiction and safety.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在前瞻性比较磁共振胰胆管成像(MRCP)中使用氯化锰四水合物(Bothdel Oral Solution 10)(MCT)、新型负性口服对比剂;柠檬酸铁铵(FerriSeltz 粉末 20%)(FAC);以及无对比剂的图像质量。

材料和方法

对随机给予 MCT(n = 19)或 FAC(n = 20)的患者的 MRCP 图像(TE 970 ms),以及 18 例未给予对比剂的患者进行评估。两位放射科医生对整体、肝外胆管和胰管的主观图像质量以及胃肠道液体的消除程度进行评分,不了解对比剂信息,使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验进行比较。

结果

MCT 和 FAC 消除胃十二指肠液的程度明显优于无对比剂者(P < 0.01 和 P < 0.01)。尽管与无对比剂者相比,MCT 的整体和肝外胆管的主观图像质量明显更好,但 FAC 无显著差异(P < 0.01 和 P = 0.21,P = 0.02 和 P = 0.16)。胰管无显著差异(P = 0.12 和 P = 0.19),MCT 和 FAC 之间的评估也无显著差异(P = 0.19-0.98)。

结论

MCT 在胰胆管显示和安全性方面与常规 FAC 表现相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验