Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99163, USA.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2009 Oct;57(4):402-18. doi: 10.1080/00207140903098817.
The authors tested tailored hypnotic inductions for age regression with an affect bridge to access meaning-laden events. They used emotional intensity, spontaneity, elaboration, and transitional-object measures to assess the genuineness of the topographic shift to primary process characteristic of hypnotic age regression. An affect bridge was used to access stressful events within the age range of 3 to 6 years. The Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C was administered to determine high hypnotizables-reals, (n = 8, scores 9-12) and low hypnotizables-simulators, (n = 8, scores 3 or less). The groups behaved differently on frequency of transitional objects, spontaneity, and intensity but not on elaboration. The hypnotizable-reals but not the simulators produced a plethora of primary-process childlike affective responses that could not be produced by the role-playing simulators.
作者们测试了针对年龄倒退的定制催眠诱导，并用情感桥梁来访问有意义的事件。他们使用情感强度、自发性、详细程度和过渡对象测量来评估催眠年龄倒退到原始过程的地形变化的真实性。使用情感桥梁来访问 3 至 6 岁年龄范围内的压力事件。斯坦福催眠易感性量表 C 版用于确定高催眠能力者-真实者（n=8，分数 9-12）和低催眠能力者-模拟者（n=8，分数 3 或更低）。两组在过渡对象的频率、自发性和强度上表现不同，但在详细程度上没有表现不同。催眠能力者-真实者而不是模拟者产生了大量无法通过角色扮演模拟者产生的原始儿童情感反应。
