国际研究诚信标准：时机已到？
International standards for research integrity: An idea whose time has come?
机构信息
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences/National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA.
出版信息
Account Res. 2009 Jul;16(4):218-28. doi: 10.1080/08989620903065350.
Abstract
A movement to promulgate international ethics standards covering areas of conduct other than research with human subjects has now begun to gain momentum. This commentary explains why it is important to develop international research integrity standards and some of the problems that must be overcome to bring them to fruition.
摘要
一场旨在颁布涵盖人类受试者研究以外行为领域的国际伦理标准的运动现已开始蓬勃发展。本评论解释了为什么制定国际研究诚信标准很重要，以及为了实现这一目标必须克服的一些问题。
相似文献
1
International standards for research integrity: An idea whose time has come?国际研究诚信标准：时机已到？
Account Res. 2009 Jul;16(4):218-28. doi: 10.1080/08989620903065350.
2
Medical editors to take tougher line.医学编辑将采取更严格的措施。
New Sci. 2004;181(2437):11.
3
Promoting ethical conduct in the publication of research.促进研究成果发表中的道德行为。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2008 Summer;26(2):89-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3466.2008.00045.x.
4
A Statement on Ethics From the HEART Group.心脏研究小组关于伦理的声明。
Circ Res. 2008 May 9;102(9):e104-5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.174243.
5
Medical editors urged to accept ethical code.医学编辑被敦促接受道德准则。
Nature. 2004 Mar 4;428(6978):5. doi: 10.1038/428005a.
6
A statement on ethics from the HEART group.心脏研究小组关于伦理的声明。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 May 1;71(6):859-61. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21555.
7
International guidelines for ethical review of epidemiological studies.流行病学研究伦理审查国际准则。
Law Med Health Care. 1991 Fall-Winter;19(3-4):247-58.
8
[Code of conduct for the implementation of article no. 30 on conflict of interest by the Italian].
Minerva Pediatr. 2007 Oct;59(5):421-3.
9
A statement on ethics from the HEART Group.心脏研究小组关于伦理的声明。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2008 May-Jun;50(6):475-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2008.02.002.
10
Research ethics III: Publication practices and authorship, conflicts of interest, and research misconduct.研究伦理 III：出版实践与作者署名、利益冲突和研究不端行为。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Feb;54(1):S346-62. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0263). Epub 2010 Nov 16.
引用本文的文献
1
Conducting and Writing Quantitative and Qualitative Research.进行和撰写定量与定性研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Sep 18;38(37):e291. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e291.
2
Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study.利益相关者对研究诚信培训实践的看法：一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 May 28;22(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00637-z.
3
A charter for biomedical research ethics in a progressive, caring society.一份关于进步、关爱型社会中生物医学研究伦理的宪章。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2015 Nov 13;10:12. doi: 10.1186/s13010-015-0032-y.
4
An international study of research misconduct policies.一项关于科研不端行为政策的国际研究。
Account Res. 2015;22(5):249-66. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.958218.
5
Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle income countries and high income countries.低收入或中等收入国家与高收入国家的研究人员之间在全球卫生研究伙伴关系中的作者身份伦理。
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 May 28;15:42. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-42.
6
Moving life science ethics debates beyond national borders: some empirical observations.推动生命科学伦理辩论超越国界：一些实证观察
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Jun;20(2):445-67. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9468-x. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
7
Policies and initiatives aimed at addressing research misconduct in high-income countries.针对高收入国家研究不端行为的政策和举措。
PLoS Med. 2013;10(3):e1001406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001406. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
8
The singapore statement on research integrity.《新加坡研究诚信声明》
Account Res. 2011 Mar;18(2):71-5. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2011.557296.
本文引用的文献
1
Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.《赫尔辛基宣言》。涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则。
J Indian Med Assoc. 2009 Jun;107(6):403-5.
2
Research ethics and lessons from Hwanggate: what can we learn from the Korean cloning fraud?研究伦理与黄禹锡事件的教训：我们能从韩国克隆造假事件中学到什么？
J Med Ethics. 2008 Mar;34(3):214-21. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.023721.
3
Responses of medical schools to institutional conflicts of interest.医学院校对机构利益冲突的应对措施。
JAMA. 2008 Feb 13;299(6):665-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.6.665.
4
Fraudulent human embryonic stem cell research in South Korea: lessons learned.韩国的人类胚胎干细胞欺诈性研究：吸取的教训。
Account Res. 2006 Jan-Mar;13(1):101-9. doi: 10.1080/08989620600634193.
5
Liability for institutional review boards: from regulation to litigation.
J Leg Med. 2004 Jun;25(2):131-84. doi: 10.1080/01947640490457451.
6
International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects.涉及人类受试者的生物医学研究国际伦理准则。
Bull Med Ethics. 2002 Oct(182):17-23.
7
From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.从巴尔的摩到贝尔实验室：关于科学不端行为二十年辩论的反思
Account Res. 2003 Apr-Jun;10(2):123-35. doi: 10.1080/08989620300508.
8
9
A national survey of policies on disclosure of conflicts of interest in biomedical research.一项关于生物医学研究中利益冲突披露政策的全国性调查。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 30;343(22):1621-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200011303432207.
Zotero 插件