College of Health Sciences and Professions, Ohio University, W380 Grover Center, Athens, OH 45701, USA.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Feb;54(1):S346-62. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0263). Epub 2010 Nov 16.
In this series of articles--Research Ethics I, Research Ethics II, and Research Ethics III--the authors provide a comprehensive review of the 9 core domains for the responsible conduct of research (RCR) as articulated by the Office of Research Integrity.
In Research Ethics III, they review the RCR domains of publication practices and authorship, conflicts of interest, and research misconduct. Whereas the legal definition of research misconduct under federal law pertains mainly to intentional falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism, they discuss a host of research practices that raise ethical concerns.
The integrity of the scientific record--its accuracy, completeness, and value--ultimately impacts the health and well-being of society. For this reason, scientists are both entrusted and obligated to use the highest standards possible when proposing, performing, reviewing, and reporting research or when educating and mentoring new investigators.
在这一系列文章——《研究伦理 I》《研究伦理 II》和《研究伦理 III》中，作者全面回顾了研究诚信办公室提出的负责任研究行为的 9 个核心领域。
在《研究伦理 III》中，他们回顾了研究伦理领域中的出版实践和作者署名、利益冲突和研究不端行为。虽然联邦法律对研究不端行为的法律定义主要涉及故意伪造、篡改和剽窃，但他们也讨论了一系列引发伦理问题的研究行为。
科学记录的完整性——其准确性、完整性和价值——最终影响着社会的健康和福祉。出于这个原因，科学家们在提出、进行、审查和报告研究，或者在教育和指导新的研究人员时，都被赋予并有义务使用尽可能高的标准。
