Clinic for Mental Health, Olso University Hospital, Aker, Norway.
Psychother Res. 2009 May;19(3):332-43. doi: 10.1080/10503300902894430.
This study examined the relationships among group therapy processes measured by the Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form, the Therapeutic Factors Inventory Cohesiveness subscale, and the Group Climate Questionnaire-Short Form in a sample of 145 patients attending 18 psychodynamic groups. Five hypothesized models were tested early in therapy (Sessions 3 and 4) using multilevel confirmatory factor analysis. Two three-factor models approached conventional standards of model fit. By merging these two models, a three-factor model consisting of member-leader alliance, positive bonding relationship, and negative relationship fit the data well. Later in therapy, member-leader bonding was no longer important to member-group cohesion, indicating that cohesion and alliance and the member-leader versus member-group bonding represent different processes.
本研究在 145 名参加 18 个心理动力学团体的患者样本中，考察了工作联盟量表-短式、治疗因素量表凝聚力分量表和团体氛围问卷-短式测量的团体治疗过程之间的关系。使用多层次验证性因素分析，在治疗早期（第 3 节和第 4 节）检验了五个假设模型。两种三因素模型接近模型拟合的传统标准。通过合并这两种模型，一个由成员-领导联盟、积极的联系关系和负面关系组成的三因素模型很好地拟合了数据。在治疗后期，成员-领导关系对成员群体凝聚力不再重要，表明凝聚力和联盟以及成员-领导与成员-群体关系代表不同的过程。
