Holosko Michael J, Thyer Bruce A, Danner J Elaine Howse
University of Georgia School of Social Work, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA.
J Evid Based Soc Work. 2009 Oct;6(4):348-60. doi: 10.1080/15433710903126778.
We review selected aspects of current ethical guidelines pertaining to the design and conduct of social work evaluation and research studies. We contend that there are significant differences between social science research and evaluation studies, and that the uncritical application of ethical guidelines suitable for regulating social science research may hinder social workers undertaking clinical and program evaluations. What is needed are ethical guidelines that distinguish between retrospective and prospectively designed studies, which enumerate when voluntary and informed consent may not be necessary in order to use data obtained from clients, and clearer standards pertaining to exempting evaluation studies from oversight by Institutional Review Boards.
我们回顾了当前与社会工作评估和研究的设计及实施相关的伦理准则的某些方面。我们认为,社会科学研究与评估研究之间存在显著差异,不加批判地应用适用于规范社会科学研究的伦理准则可能会阻碍社会工作者进行临床和项目评估。我们需要的是能够区分回顾性设计研究和前瞻性设计研究的伦理准则,这些准则应列举出在何种情况下为使用从服务对象处获得的数据而无需获得自愿且知情的同意,以及关于使评估研究免于机构审查委员会监督的更明确标准。