Centre for Environmental Policy and Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, United Kingdom.
Conserv Biol. 2010 Aug;24(4):1119-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01446.x. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
Conservation interventions require evaluation to understand what factors predict success or failure. To date, there has been little systematic investigation of the effect of social and cultural context on conservation success, although a large body of literature argues it is important. We investigated whether local cultural context, particularly local institutions and the efforts of interventions to engage with this culture significantly influence conservation outcomes. We also tested the effects of community participation, conservation education, benefit provision, and market integration. We systematically reviewed the literature on community-based conservation and identified 68 interventions suitable for inclusion. We used a protocol to extract and code information and evaluated a range of measures of outcome success (attitudinal, behavioral, ecological, and economic). We also examined the association of each predictor with each outcome measure and the structure of predictor covariance. Local institutional context influenced intervention outcomes, and interventions that engaged with local institutions were more likely to succeed. Nevertheless, there was limited support for the role of community participation, conservation education, benefit provision, and market integration on intervention success. We recommend that conservation interventions seek to understand the societies they work with and tailor their activities accordingly. Systematic reviews are a valuable approach for assessing conservation evidence, although sensitive to the continuing lack of high-quality reporting on conservation interventions.
保护干预措施需要进行评估,以了解哪些因素可以预测成功或失败。迄今为止,尽管有大量文献认为社会和文化背景对保护成功很重要,但对其影响的系统研究却很少。我们调查了当地文化背景,特别是当地机构以及干预措施在多大程度上努力与这种文化相契合,是否会显著影响保护结果。我们还测试了社区参与、保护教育、利益提供和市场一体化的影响。我们系统地回顾了基于社区的保护文献,并确定了 68 项适合纳入的干预措施。我们使用协议提取和编码信息,并评估了一系列态度、行为、生态和经济方面的结果成功衡量标准。我们还检查了每个预测因子与每个结果衡量标准的关联,以及预测因子协方差的结构。当地制度背景影响了干预措施的结果,而与当地机构合作的干预措施更有可能取得成功。然而,对于社区参与、保护教育、利益提供和市场一体化对干预措施成功的作用,支持的证据有限。我们建议保护干预措施应努力了解其合作的社会,并相应地调整其活动。系统评价是评估保护证据的一种有价值的方法,尽管对保护干预措施缺乏高质量报告的问题仍然敏感。