Suppr超能文献

后排乘客胸部在近侧碰撞中的保护

Rear seat occupant thorax protection in near side impacts.

作者信息

Bohman Katarina, Rosén Erik, Sunnevang Cecilia, Boström Ola

机构信息

Autoliv Research, Vårgårda, Sweden.

出版信息

Ann Adv Automot Med. 2009 Oct;53:3-12.

Abstract

Thoracic side-airbags (SAB) have proven to protect front seat occupants in side impacts. This benefit has not been evaluated for rear seat occupants who are typically small statured. The objective was to analyze field data from rear seat occupants in near side impacts, and evaluate the effect of a SAB in the rear seat, through full scale vehicle tests. A field study using the NASS-CDS database was performed to review rear seat crash characteristics, occupant injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale 3+, AIS3+) and injury sources. Full scale tests were performed with the side impact dummy SID-IIs at two different crash severities, with and without SAB in a midsize passenger car. Field data showed that of all AIS3+ injured restrained occupants 13 years and older, 59% had AIS3+ thoracic injuries and 38% had AIS3+ head injuries. The thoracic injuries were distributed to lungs (60%), skeletal fractures (38%) and injuries to arteries (1,26%) and heart (0,1%). For AIS3+ injured children, age 4-12, 51% had AIS3+ thoracic injuries and 54% had AIS3+ head injuries. Compared to adults, children sustained less fractures and more lung injuries. The rear side interior was the main injury source regardless of age group. In the full scale tests, the thoracic side-airbag reduced the average rib deflection by 50% and resulted in an AIS3+ injury risk reduction from 36% to 3%. At the higher impact speed, SAB reduced the injury risk from 93% to 24%. The full scale crash tests showed that SAB offer a significant potential for thoracic injury reduction in the crash severities causing the majority of serious injuries in real life crashes.

摘要

胸部侧面安全气囊(SAB)已被证明可在侧面碰撞中保护前排座椅乘客。对于通常身材矮小的后排座椅乘客,尚未评估这种益处。目的是分析近侧碰撞中后排座椅乘客的现场数据,并通过全尺寸车辆测试评估后排座椅中SAB的效果。使用NASS-CDS数据库进行了一项现场研究,以审查后排座椅碰撞特征、乘客损伤(简略损伤量表3级及以上,AIS3+)和损伤来源。在一辆中型乘用车中,使用侧面碰撞假人SID-IIs在两种不同的碰撞严重程度下进行了全尺寸测试,有SAB和无SAB的情况。现场数据显示,在所有13岁及以上受AIS3+损伤的系安全带乘客中,59%有AIS3+胸部损伤,38%有AIS3+头部损伤。胸部损伤分布在肺部(60%)、骨骼骨折(38%)以及动脉损伤(1.26%)和心脏损伤(0.1%)。对于4至12岁受AIS3+损伤的儿童,51%有AIS3+胸部损伤,54%有AIS3+头部损伤。与成人相比,儿童骨折较少,肺部损伤较多。无论年龄组如何,后排座椅内部都是主要的损伤来源。在全尺寸测试中,胸部侧面安全气囊使肋骨平均挠度降低了50%,并使AIS3+损伤风险从36%降至3%。在较高的碰撞速度下,SAB将损伤风险从93%降至24%。全尺寸碰撞测试表明,在现实生活碰撞中导致大多数严重损伤的碰撞严重程度下,SAB在降低胸部损伤方面具有显著潜力。

相似文献

10
Adapting load limiter deployment for frontal crash diversity.适应正面碰撞多样性的限载器展开。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup2):S43-S49. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1702648. Epub 2020 Jan 6.

本文引用的文献

9
Factors influencing pediatric injury in side impact collisions.
J Trauma. 2001 Sep;51(3):469-77. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200109000-00008.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验