• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同速度下远侧侧面雪橇试验中儿童安全座椅的性能评估

Performance evaluation of child safety seats in far-side lateral sled tests at varying speeds.

作者信息

Ghati Yoganand, Menon Rajiv A, Milone Mary, Lankarani Hamid, Oliveres Gerardo

机构信息

The Center for Injury Research and Prevention, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Adv Automot Med. 2009 Oct;53:221-35.

PMID:20184846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3256792/
Abstract

Protection of children in Child Safety Seats (CSS) in side impact crashes has been a topic of recent studies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of CSS in far-side impacts through a series of sled tests conducted at varying test speeds. Forty eight sled tests were conducted at three speeds (24 km/h, 29 km/h and 36 km/h), under two different CSS attachment conditions (LATCH and seat belt attached), using rear facing and forward facing CSS from four different manufacturers. Analyses were conducted to examine head retention within the CSS, velocity of the head as it passes an imaginary plane (cross over into other occupant space or door), lateral trajectory of the head and knee; head, chest and pelvis accelerations; neck and lumbar loads and moments. In addition to these parameters, the CSS were visually inspected for structural integrity after each test. Results from these sled tests highlighted the differential performance of CSS in far-side impacts. During the tests, all CSS experienced significant lateral movement irrespective of attachment type. In rear facing CSS tests, one of the designs failed as the seat disengaged from its base. In forward facing CSS tests, it was observed that the seat belt attached CSS experienced less rotational motion than the LATCH attached CSS. ATD head retention within the seat was not achieved with either CSS attachments at any speed. The findings from this study augment the current efforts to define regulatory sled setup procedure for far-side impact crashes involving children in CSS, which currently does not exist and will eventually further the protection of children in automobiles.

摘要

儿童安全座椅(CSS)在侧面碰撞事故中对儿童的保护一直是近期研究的主题。本研究的目的是通过在不同测试速度下进行的一系列雪橇试验,评估CSS在远侧碰撞中的性能。在三种速度(24公里/小时、29公里/小时和36公里/小时)下,在两种不同的CSS固定条件(使用低锚定和安全带固定)下,使用来自四个不同制造商的后向和前向CSS进行了48次雪橇试验。进行分析以检查头部在CSS内的固定情况、头部经过假想平面(进入其他乘员空间或车门)时的速度、头部和膝盖的横向轨迹;头部、胸部和骨盆的加速度;颈部和腰部的负荷和力矩。除了这些参数外,每次试验后还对CSS的结构完整性进行了目视检查。这些雪橇试验的结果突出了CSS在远侧碰撞中的不同性能。在试验过程中,所有CSS无论固定类型如何都经历了显著的横向移动。在后向CSS试验中,其中一种设计失败,因为座椅与其底座分离。在前向CSS试验中,观察到使用安全带固定的CSS比使用低锚定固定的CSS旋转运动更少。在任何速度下,两种CSS固定方式都无法实现假人头部在座椅内的固定。本研究的结果加强了目前为涉及坐在CSS中的儿童的远侧碰撞事故定义监管雪橇设置程序的努力,目前该程序尚不存在,最终将进一步加强对汽车中儿童的保护。

相似文献

1
Performance evaluation of child safety seats in far-side lateral sled tests at varying speeds.不同速度下远侧侧面雪橇试验中儿童安全座椅的性能评估
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2009 Oct;53:221-35.
2
Protection of children in forward-facing child restraint systems during oblique side impact sled tests: Intrusion and tether effects.在斜向侧面碰撞雪橇试验中,前向儿童约束系统对儿童的保护作用:侵入和系绳效应。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Sep;17 Suppl 1:156-62. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1194982.
3
The influence of child restraint lower attachment method on protection offered by forward facing child restraint systems in oblique loading conditions.儿童约束装置下部连接方法对前向儿童约束系统在斜向加载条件下提供的保护作用的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 Feb 28;19(sup1):S139-S145. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1369532.
4
The Influence of Enhanced Side Impact Protection on Kinematics and Injury Measures of Far- or Center-Seated Children in Forward-Facing Child Restraints.增强侧面碰撞保护对前向儿童安全座椅中远侧或中间位置儿童运动学及损伤指标的影响
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S9-S15. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1064116.
5
Responses of the Q6/Q6s ATD Positioned in Booster Seats in the Far-Side Seat Location of Side Impact Passenger Car and Sled Tests.位于侧面碰撞乘用车远侧座椅位置的增高座椅中的Q6/Q6s加速度计在台车试验中的响应。
Stapp Car Crash J. 2015 Nov;59:313-35. doi: 10.4271/2015-22-0012.
6
Effects of LATCH versus Available Seatbelt Installation of Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems on Head Injury Criteria for 6 Month Old Infants in Rear End Collisions.后向儿童约束系统的LATCH与可用安全带安装方式对6个月大婴儿在追尾碰撞中头部损伤标准的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S16-23. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1067804.
7
Occupant responses in conventional and ABTS seats in high-speed rear sled tests.在高速后碰撞模拟台车试验中,常规座椅和 ABTS 座椅上的乘客反应。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 Jan 2;19(1):54-59. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1347782. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
8
Analysis of the lack of restraint with and without belt pretensioning in 40.2 km/h rear impacts.在40.2公里/小时的尾部碰撞中,对有无安全带预紧功能时的约束缺失情况进行分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(3):196-202. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2121143. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
9
Comparative performance of forward-facing child restraint systems on the C/FMVSS 213 bench and vehicle seats.前向儿童约束系统在C/FMVSS 213试验台和车辆座椅上的性能比较
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15 Suppl 1:S103-10. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.935358.
10
Effectiveness of center-mounted airbag in far-side impacts based on THOR sled tests.基于 THOR 碰撞测试,中央气囊在远侧碰撞中的有效性。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(7):726-731. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1650266. Epub 2019 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Injury potential at center rear seating positions in rear-facing child restraint systems in side impacts.后向式儿童约束系统在侧面碰撞中后排中间座位位置的受伤风险
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2013;57:281-96.