Deptsof Pulmonary Medicine, MedizinischeHochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Eur Respir J. 2010 Sep;36(3):601-7. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00163309. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
Increasing worldwide development of antimicrobial resistance and the association of resistance development and antibiotic overuse make it necessary to seek strategies for safely reducing antibiotic use and selection pressure. In a first step, in a non-interventional study, the antibiotic prescription rates, initial procalcitonin (PCT) levels and outcome of 702 patients presenting with acute respiratory infection at 45 primary care physicians were observed. The second part was a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial comparing standard care with PCT-guided antimicrobial treatment in 550 patients in the same setting. Antibiotics were recommended at a PCT threshold of 0.25 ng·mL(-1). Clinical overruling was permitted. The primary end-point for non-inferiority was number of days with significant health impairment after 14 days. Antibiotics were prescribed in 30.3% of enrolled patients in the non-interventional study. In the interventional study, 36.7% of patients in the control group received antibiotics as compared to 21.5% in the PCT-guided group (41.6% reduction). In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, the numbers of days with significant health impairment were similar (mean 9.04 versus 9.00 for PCT-guided and control group, respectively; difference 0.04; 95% confidence interval -0.73-0.81). This was also true after adjusting for the most important confounders. In the PCT group, advice was overruled in 36 cases. There was no significant difference in primary end-point when comparing the PCT group treated as advised, the overruled PCT group and the control group (9.008 versus 9.250 versus 9.000 days; p = 0.9605). A simple one-point PCT measurement for guiding decisions on antibiotic treatment is non-inferior to standard treatment in terms of safety, and effectively reduced the antibiotic treatment rate by 41.6%.
在全球范围内,抗生素耐药性不断增加,且耐药性的产生与抗生素的过度使用密切相关,因此有必要寻找安全减少抗生素使用和选择压力的策略。在第一步的非干预性研究中,观察了 45 名初级保健医生治疗的 702 名急性呼吸道感染患者的抗生素处方率、初始降钙素原(PCT)水平和结局。第二步是在相同环境下对 550 名患者进行了随机对照非劣效性试验,比较标准治疗与 PCT 指导的抗生素治疗。抗生素推荐在 PCT 阈值为 0.25ng·mL(-1)时使用。允许临床推翻。非劣效性的主要终点是 14 天后健康受损的天数。在非干预性研究中,入组患者中有 30.3%被开了抗生素。在干预性研究中,对照组有 36.7%的患者接受了抗生素治疗,而 PCT 指导组有 21.5%的患者接受了抗生素治疗(减少 41.6%)。在修改后的意向治疗分析中,健康受损的天数相似(PCT 指导组和对照组分别为 9.04 天和 9.00 天;差值为 0.04;95%置信区间为 -0.73-0.81)。在调整了最重要的混杂因素后也是如此。在 PCT 组中,有 36 例建议被推翻。比较按建议治疗的 PCT 组、被推翻的 PCT 组和对照组的主要终点没有显著差异(9.008 天、9.250 天、9.000 天;p = 0.9605)。简单的一点 PCT 测量用于指导抗生素治疗决策在安全性方面与标准治疗非劣效,并有效降低了抗生素治疗率 41.6%。