Guiotti Aimée Maria, Goiato Marcelo Coelho, dos Santos Daniela Micheline
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Santa Fé do Sul Dental School, Faculdades Integradas de Santa Fé do Sul, Santa Fé do Sul, Brazil.
J Craniofac Surg. 2010 Mar;21(2):323-7. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181cf5fa4.
The failure of facial prostheses is caused by limitations in the properties of existing materials, especially flexibility and durability. Therefore, this study evaluated the Shore A hardness of silicone used for fabrication of facial prostheses, Silastic MDX4-4210, according to the influence of storage period, daily disinfection, and 2 types of pigmentation. Thirty specimens were fabricated and divided in 3 groups: colorless, pigmented with makeup, and pigmented with iron oxide. Analysis of results was assessed on a Shore A hardness meter immediately, 6 months, and 1 year after fabrication of specimens, following the guidelines of the American Society for Testing and Materials. The hardness values were statistically analyzed by the Tukey test. The silicone exhibited an increase in hardness with time. However, the hardness was stable from 6 months to 1 year. It was concluded that the silicone is within the values of Shore A hardness reported in the literature, regardless of the storage period, pigmentation, and chemical disinfection.
面部假体的失败是由现有材料性能的局限性导致的,尤其是柔韧性和耐用性。因此,本研究根据储存期、日常消毒以及两种色素沉着类型的影响,评估了用于制造面部假体的硅橡胶Silastic MDX4-4210的邵氏A硬度。制作了30个样本,并将其分为3组:无色、用化妆品染色、用氧化铁染色。根据美国材料与试验协会的指导方针,在样本制作完成后立即、6个月和1年后,使用邵氏A硬度计对结果进行分析评估。硬度值通过Tukey检验进行统计分析。硅橡胶的硬度随时间增加。然而,从6个月到1年,硬度保持稳定。得出的结论是,无论储存期、色素沉着和化学消毒情况如何,该硅橡胶的邵氏A硬度值均在文献报道的范围内。