Suppr超能文献

头颈部晚期癌症的动脉内与静脉内放化疗比较:一项随机 3 期试验结果。

Intra-arterial versus intravenous chemoradiation for advanced head and neck cancer: Results of a randomized phase 3 trial.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoekhuis, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Cancer. 2010 May 1;116(9):2159-65. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24916.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chemoradiation is the preferred treatment for advanced stage IV head and neck cancer. Higher doses of chemotherapy yielded promising results in vitro and vivo, confirmed by intra-arterial (IA) cisplatin-based chemoradiation in phase 2 studies.

METHODS

Two hundred and thirty-nine patients with (functionally) unresectable head and neck cancer were included, from 2000 to 2004, in a multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial, comparing IA and intravenous chemoradiation. Intravenous chemoradiation comprised 3x100 mg/m(2) cisplatin infusion on Days 1, 22, 43 combined with 70 Gy in 35 daily fractions. The IA chemoradiation treatment arm comprised 4x150 mg/m(2) cisplatin administered in the tumor-feeding artery on Days 1, 8, 15, 22, immediately followed by systemic rescue with sodium thiosulfate with the same radiotherapeutic regimen.

RESULTS

Two patients were excluded from analysis because of nontreatment-related death immediately after randomization (n = 1) and esophageal carcinoma (n = 1). The median follow-up was 33 months 1-104 months. Ninety percent of the patients required tube feeding during treatment. Renal toxicity >grade 2 was 9% in the intravenous compared with 1% in the IA treatment arm (P <or= .0001). There was no difference in locoregional control, disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS), between the treatment arms. At 3 years, local control, locoregional control, DFS, and OS was .76, .63, .44, .51 in the IA versus .70, .65, .47, .47 in the intravenous treatment arm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cisplatin-based IA chemoradiation was not superior to intravenous chemoradiation for advanced stage IV head and neck cancer regarding locoregional control and survival.

摘要

背景

化学放射疗法是治疗晚期 IV 期头颈部癌症的首选方法。更高剂量的化疗在体外和体内都取得了有希望的结果,这在 2 期研究中的动脉内(IA)顺铂为基础的放化疗中得到了证实。

方法

2000 年至 2004 年期间,239 例(功能)不可切除的头颈部癌症患者参与了一项多中心、随机 3 期试验,比较了 IA 和静脉化疗联合放疗。静脉化疗包括在第 1、22、43 天给予 3x100mg/m(2)顺铂输注,联合 70Gy 分 35 次每日剂量。IA 化疗组在第 1、8、15、22 天给予 4x150mg/m(2)顺铂,立即在肿瘤供血动脉内给予全身解救剂硫代硫酸钠,同时采用相同的放射治疗方案。

结果

由于随机分组后立即发生非治疗相关死亡(n = 1)和食管癌(n = 1),有 2 例患者被排除在分析之外。中位随访时间为 33 个月(1-104 个月)。90%的患者在治疗期间需要管饲。静脉组的肾功能毒性 >2 级为 9%,IA 组为 1%(P <or=.0001)。两组的局部区域控制、无病生存率(DFS)或总生存率(OS)无差异。在 3 年时,IA 组的局部控制、局部区域控制、DFS 和 OS 分别为.76、.63、.44、.51,静脉组分别为.70、.65、.47、.47。

结论

对于晚期 IV 期头颈部癌症,基于顺铂的 IA 化疗联合放疗在局部区域控制和生存方面并不优于静脉化疗联合放疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验