Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Mar;31(3):663-72. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22108.
To assess added value of a new time-resolved technique with temporal interpolation and stochastic spiral trajectory through k-space and parallel imaging (TR-MRA) to conventional bolus chase MRA (BC-MRA) for infragenual peripheral artery evaluation.
An institutional review board-approved retrospective review of peripheral arterial disease patients was performed. Infragenual TR-MRA and BC-MRA were performed in 26 patients over four months. Two readers individually assessed image quality, diagnostic confidence, and stenosis severity and length in 13 defined below knee segments, first with BC-MRA alone, and then with a combined BC-MRA and TR-MRA reading (BC+TR-MRA). Perceived contribution of TR-MRA was rated by each reader. The reference standard was a consensus reading of both sequences. Catheter angiographic (CA) correlation was available in 6 patients.
A total of 646 infragenual segments in 51 extremities were evaluated. Image quality and diagnostic confidence were superior for BC+TR-MRA compared with BC-MRA alone (P < 0.001). Adding TR-MRA improved sensitivity (85.7% versus 80.7%; P < 0.05) and diagnostic accuracy (88.1% versus 85.4%; P < 0.05) for hemodynamically significant stenosis. Venous contamination (0% versus 13.1% segments) and motion (0.9% versus 8.0%) were decreased for BC+TR-MRA versus BC-MRA alone, P < 0.01. For BC+TR-MRA, TR-MRA was rated more useful than BC-MRA in 30/51 legs (58.8%). TR-MRA identified retrograde flow in 5 segments. Where available, there was high concordance between CA and BC+TR-MRA (91.6%) for stenosis.
Adding TR-MRA with temporal interpolation and stochastic spiral trajectories to bolus chase MRA improves image quality, diagnostic confidence and accuracy. It provides hemodynamic information and minimizes venous contamination and patient motion.
评估一种新的时间分辨技术(采用时间内插和随机螺旋轨迹填充 K 空间并行成像)在下肢外周动脉评估中相对于传统的团注追踪 MRA(BC-MRA)的附加价值。
对患有外周动脉疾病的患者进行了机构审查委员会批准的回顾性研究。在四个月内对 26 例患者进行了下肢 TR-MRA 和 BC-MRA 检查。两位读者分别单独评估了 13 个定义的膝关节以下节段的图像质量、诊断信心和狭窄程度及长度,首先单独使用 BC-MRA 进行评估,然后使用 BC-MRA 和 TR-MRA 联合阅读(BC+TR-MRA)进行评估。每位读者都对 TR-MRA 的贡献进行了评分。参考标准是两种序列的共识阅读。在 6 例患者中可获得导管血管造影(CA)相关性。
共评估了 51 条肢体的 646 个下肢节段。与 BC-MRA 相比,BC+TR-MRA 的图像质量和诊断信心更高(P < 0.001)。添加 TR-MRA 可提高对血流动力学显著狭窄的敏感性(85.7%对 80.7%;P < 0.05)和诊断准确性(88.1%对 85.4%;P < 0.05)。与 BC-MRA 相比,BC+TR-MRA 下静脉污染(0%对 13.1%的节段)和运动(0.9%对 8.0%)减少,P < 0.01。对于 BC+TR-MRA,与 BC-MRA 相比,TR-MRA 在 51 条腿中的 30 条(58.8%)中被评为更有用。TR-MRA 在 5 个节段中识别到逆行血流。在有 CA 相关性的情况下,BC+TR-MRA 与 CA 对狭窄的相关性非常高(91.6%)。
在团注追踪 MRA 中添加时间内插和随机螺旋轨迹的 TR-MRA 可提高图像质量、诊断信心和准确性。它提供血流动力学信息,并最大限度地减少静脉污染和患者运动。