Suppr超能文献

卡维地洛和乐卡地平对 CAPD 患者超滤和溶质转运的比较影响。

Comparative effects of carvedilol and lercanidipine on ultrafiltration and solute transport in CAPD patients.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Trabzon Training and Research Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey.

出版信息

Ren Fail. 2009;31(6):446-51. doi: 10.1080/08860220902979364.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peritonitis, the type of buffer used in the dialysate, continue ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) of greater than two years duration, increased exposure to dialysate glucose, diabetes mellitus, and the use of beta blockers may contribute to impaired ultrafiltration.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study is to compare the effects of a calcium-channel blocker and a beta-blocker on the peritoneal transport and clearance.

METHODS

We studied 48 patients with ESRD on chronic peritoneal dialysis, included 27 females and 19 males with mean age 42.6 +/- 16.4 years. Two patients were excluded from the study due to peritonitis. Patients were treated either with carvedilol or lercanidipine. In all patients; peritoneal equilibration test (PET), ultrafiltration (UF), Kt/V ratio, creatinine clearance (CrCl), systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, serum BUN, creatinine, glucose, sodium, potassium, albumin, cholesterol, and triglyceride values were obtained before and after 8 weeks from the start of the drug treatment.

RESULTS

Lercanidipine and carvedilol showed a good antihypertensive effect in CAPD patients. Both drugs had a good tolerability profile and showed no effect on plasma lipids. There were no differences in terms of PET, ultrafiltration, Kt/V ratio, CrCl, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, serum BUN, creatinine, glucose, sodium, and potassium values between both patient groups. After antihypertensive treatment, neither group showed a difference in the above-mentioned parameters (p > 0.05) except potassium, which was significantly higher in the carvedilol group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In CAPD patients. short-term usage of carvedilol has no effect on ultrafiltration and solute transport like lercanidipine. Both drugs showed a good antihypertensive effect.

摘要

背景

腹膜炎、透析液中使用的缓冲液类型、持续进行大于两年的门诊持续性不卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)、暴露于更多的透析液葡萄糖、糖尿病以及β受体阻滞剂的使用,都可能导致超滤功能受损。

目的

本研究旨在比较钙通道阻滞剂和β受体阻滞剂对腹膜转运和清除率的影响。

方法

我们研究了 48 例接受慢性腹膜透析的终末期肾病患者,包括 27 名女性和 19 名男性,平均年龄为 42.6±16.4 岁。由于腹膜炎,有 2 例患者被排除在研究之外。患者分别接受卡维地洛或乐卡地平治疗。所有患者在开始药物治疗 8 周前后均进行腹膜平衡试验(PET)、超滤(UF)、Kt/V 比值、肌酐清除率(CrCl)、收缩压、舒张压、血清 BUN、肌酐、葡萄糖、钠、钾、白蛋白、胆固醇和甘油三酯值。

结果

乐卡地平和卡维地洛在 CAPD 患者中均显示出良好的降压效果。两种药物均具有良好的耐受性,对血脂无影响。两组患者在 PET、超滤、Kt/V 比值、CrCl、收缩压、舒张压、血清 BUN、肌酐、葡萄糖、钠和钾值方面均无差异。在降压治疗后,两组患者在上述参数方面均无差异(p>0.05),除了钾,卡维地洛组明显升高(p<0.05)。

结论

在 CAPD 患者中,卡维地洛短期使用对超滤和乐卡地平的溶质转运没有影响。两种药物均显示出良好的降压效果。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验