• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种通过问卷来衡量零食相对强化效力的方法。

A questionnaire approach to measuring the relative reinforcing efficacy of snack foods.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, New York 14214-3000, United States.

出版信息

Eat Behav. 2010 Apr;11(2):67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2009.09.006. Epub 2009 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2009.09.006
PMID:20188288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2880400/
Abstract

Behavioral choice theory and laboratory choice paradigms can provide a framework to understand the reinforcing efficacy or reinforcing value of food. Reinforcing efficacy is measured in the laboratory by assessing how much effort one will engage in to gain access to food as the amount of work progressively increases. However, this method to establish demand curves as estimates of reinforcer efficacy is time consuming and limits the number of reinforcers that can be tested. The general aim of this study was to compare the reinforcing efficacy of snack foods using a behavioral task that requires subjects to respond to gain access to portions of food (LAB task) with a questionnaire version of a purchasing task designed to determine demand curves (QUES task) in nonobese and obese adults (n=24). Results showed correlations between the maximal amount of money that individuals were willing to spend for food (QUES O(max)) and the maximal amount of responses made on the highest reinforcement schedule completed (LAB O(max)) (r=0.45, p<0.05), and between BMI and the LAB O(max) (r=0.43, p<0.05) and the QUES O(max) (r=0.52, p<0.05). The study suggests the questionnaire provides valid measures of reinforcing efficacy that can be used in place of or in conjunction with traditional laboratory paradigms to establish demand curves that describe the behavioral maintaining properties of food.

摘要

行为选择理论和实验室选择范式可以为理解食物的强化效力或强化价值提供框架。强化效力在实验室中通过评估一个人在逐步增加工作量的情况下为获得食物而投入的努力程度来衡量。然而,这种方法建立需求曲线作为强化效力的估计是耗时的,并且限制了可以测试的强化物的数量。本研究的一般目的是比较使用需要受试者通过响应获得食物部分的行为任务(LAB 任务)和旨在确定需求曲线的购买任务的问卷版本(QUES 任务)来确定零食的强化效力,该任务针对非肥胖和肥胖成年人(n=24)。结果表明,个体愿意为食物花费的最大金额(QUES O(max))与完成的最高强化计划中做出的最大响应数量(LAB O(max))之间存在相关性(r=0.45,p<0.05),以及体重指数与 LAB O(max)(r=0.43,p<0.05)和 QUES O(max)(r=0.52,p<0.05)之间存在相关性。该研究表明,问卷提供了有效的强化效力测量,可以替代或与传统的实验室范式结合使用,以建立描述食物行为维持特性的需求曲线。

相似文献

1
A questionnaire approach to measuring the relative reinforcing efficacy of snack foods.一种通过问卷来衡量零食相对强化效力的方法。
Eat Behav. 2010 Apr;11(2):67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2009.09.006. Epub 2009 Sep 27.
2
Differential effects of daily snack food intake on the reinforcing value of food in obese and nonobese women.日常零食摄入量对肥胖和非肥胖女性食物强化值的不同影响。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 Aug;90(2):304-13. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27283. Epub 2009 May 20.
3
Effects of daily snack food intake on food reinforcement depend on body mass index and energy density.每日零食摄入对食物强化的影响取决于体重指数和能量密度。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Feb;91(2):300-8. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28632. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
4
Sensitization of food reinforcement is related to weight status and baseline food reinforcement.食物强化物的敏化与体重状况和基线食物强化物有关。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2012 Aug;36(8):1102-7. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2011.210. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
5
The relationships between eating disorder pathology and relative reinforcing value of food, delay discounting, and related constructs in adolescents.青少年饮食障碍病理与食物相对强化价值、延迟折扣及相关建构之间的关系。
Appetite. 2020 May 1;148:104576. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104576. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
6
Reinforcing value and hypothetical behavioral economic demand for food and their relation to BMI.强化对食物的价值及假设的行为经济需求及其与体重指数的关系。
Eat Behav. 2018 Apr;29:120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
7
Experimental scarcity increases the relative reinforcing value of food in food insecure adults.实验性匮乏会增加食物不安全的成年人对食物的相对强化价值。
Appetite. 2018 Sep 1;128:106-115. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.05.148. Epub 2018 May 29.
8
The reinforcing value of palatable snack foods and its relationship to subtypes of behavioural and self-report impulsivity.美味休闲食品的强化价值及其与行为冲动和自我报告冲动亚型的关系。
Eat Behav. 2016 Apr;21:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
9
Working memory and attentional bias on reinforcing efficacy of food.工作记忆与对食物强化效能的注意偏向。
Appetite. 2017 Sep 1;116:268-276. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 May 9.
10
Relative reinforcing value of energy-dense snack foods in overweight and obese adults.超重和肥胖成年人中能量密集型休闲食品的相对强化值
Can J Diet Pract Res. 2011 Winter;72(4):170-4. doi: 10.3148/72.4.2011.170.

引用本文的文献

1
Food Cue Reactivity Meets the Reinforcer Pathology Model: Behavioral Economic Measures of Cue-Induced Changes in Food Reinforcer Efficacy.食物线索反应性与强化物病理学模型相遇:线索诱导的食物强化物效能变化的行为经济学测量
Perspect Behav Sci. 2024 Jul 2;47(2):393-416. doi: 10.1007/s40614-024-00409-1. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Prospective relations of maternal reward-related eating, pregnancy ultra-processed food intake and weight indicators, and feeding mode with infant appetitive traits.前瞻性研究母亲的奖励性进食、孕期超加工食品摄入和体重指标,以及喂养方式与婴儿食欲特质的关系。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Aug 3;19(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01334-9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Overweight children find food more reinforcing and consume more energy than do nonoverweight children.超重儿童比非超重儿童觉得食物更具强化作用,且消耗更多能量。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 May;87(5):1121-7. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.5.1121.
2
Further validation of a cigarette purchase task for assessing the relative reinforcing efficacy of nicotine in college smokers.用于评估大学吸烟者中尼古丁相对强化效力的香烟购买任务的进一步验证。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Feb;16(1):57-65. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.16.1.57.
3
Price and maternal obesity influence purchasing of low- and high-energy-dense foods.
A novel model of obesity prediction: Neurobehaviors as targets for treatment.
一种新的肥胖预测模型:神经行为作为治疗靶点。
Behav Neurosci. 2021 Jun;135(3):426-442. doi: 10.1037/bne0000385.
4
The influence of COVID-19-related stress on food motivation.新冠疫情相关压力对食物动机的影响。
Appetite. 2021 Aug 1;163:105233. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105233. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
5
The accelerator, the brake, and the terrain: associations of reward-related eating, self-regulation, and the home food environment with diet quality during pregnancy and postpartum in the pregnancy eating attributes study (PEAS) cohort.加速器、制动器和地形:奖励相关饮食、自我调节以及家庭食物环境与妊娠和产后饮食属性研究(PEAS)队列中孕期和产后饮食质量的关联。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Nov 23;17(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01047-x.
6
Managing Outliers in Adolescent Food Frequency Questionnaire Data.管理青少年食物频率问卷数据中的异常值。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2021 Jan;53(1):28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
7
The impact of short sleep on food reward processes in adolescents.青少年睡眠不足对食物奖赏过程的影响。
J Sleep Res. 2021 Apr;30(2):e13054. doi: 10.1111/jsr.13054. Epub 2020 May 7.
8
Progress of and Prospects for Hypothetical Purchase Task Questionnaires in Consumer Behavior Analysis and Public Policy.消费者行为分析与公共政策中假设购买任务问卷的进展与前景
Behav Anal. 2017 Apr 4;40(2):329-342. doi: 10.1007/s40614-017-0100-2. eCollection 2017 Nov.
9
Behavioral economic measurement of cigarette demand: A descriptive review of published approaches to the cigarette purchase task.行为经济学对香烟需求的衡量:香烟购买任务中已出版方法的描述性综述。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Dec;28(6):688-705. doi: 10.1037/pha0000347. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
10
Poor sleep and adolescent obesity risk: a narrative review of potential mechanisms.睡眠不佳与青少年肥胖风险:潜在机制的叙述性综述
Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2019 Sep 9;10:117-130. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S219594. eCollection 2019.
价格和孕妇肥胖状况会影响高能量密度和低能量密度食品的购买。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Oct;86(4):914-22. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/86.4.914.
4
Food reinforcement and eating: a multilevel analysis.食物强化与饮食:多层次分析
Psychol Bull. 2007 Sep;133(5):884-906. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.884.
5
Relative reinforcing efficacy of alcohol among college student drinkers.大学生饮酒者中酒精的相对强化效力。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 May;14(2):219-27. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.14.2.219.
6
Replacing relative reinforcing efficacy with behavioral economic demand curves.用行为经济需求曲线取代相对强化效力。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 Jan;85(1):73-93. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.102-04.
7
Purchases of food in youth. Influence of price and income.青少年时期的食品购买情况。价格与收入的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Jan;17(1):82-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01668.x.
8
Validation of a questionnaire measure of the relative reinforcing value of food.一种食物相对强化价值问卷测量方法的验证
Eat Behav. 2005 Jun;6(3):283-92. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2004.11.004. Epub 2004 Dec 14.
9
Relation between food reinforcement and dopamine genotypes and its effect on food intake in smokers.食物强化与多巴胺基因型之间的关系及其对吸烟者食物摄入量的影响。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Jul;80(1):82-8. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/80.1.82.
10
Deconstructing relative reinforcing efficacy and situating the measures of pharmacological reinforcement with behavioral economics: a theoretical proposal.解构相对强化效能并将药理学强化措施置于行为经济学框架下:一项理论提议。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000 Dec;153(1):44-56. doi: 10.1007/s002130000589.