Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, USA Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, USA MGH/MIT/HMS Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, USA.
Pain. 2010 May;149(2):202-207. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.11.012. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
Behavioral analgesic techniques such as distraction reduce pain in both clinical and experimental settings. Individuals differ in the magnitude of distraction-induced analgesia, and additional study is needed to identify the factors that influence the pain relieving effects of distraction. Catastrophizing, a set of negative emotional and cognitive processes, is widely recognized to be associated with increased reports of pain. We sought to evaluate the relationship between catastrophizing and distraction analgesia. Healthy participants completed three sessions in a randomized order. In one session (Pain Alone), pain was induced by topical application of a 10% capsaicin cream and simultaneous administration of a tonic heat stimulus. In another session (Pain+Distraction), identical capsaicin+heat application procedures were followed, but subjects played video games that required a high level of attention. During both sessions, verbal ratings of pain were obtained and participants rated their degree of catastrophizing. During the other session (Distraction Alone) subjects played the video games in the absence of any pain stimulus. Pain was rated significantly lower during the distraction session compared to the "Pain Alone" session. In addition, high catastrophizers rated pain significantly higher regardless of whether the subjects were distracted. Catastrophizing did not influence the overall degree of distraction analgesia; however, early in the session high catastrophizers had little distraction analgesia, though later in the session low and high catastrophizers rated pain similarly. These results suggest that both distraction and catastrophizing have substantial effects on experimental pain in normal subjects and these variables interact as a function of time.
行为镇痛技术,如分散注意力,可以减轻临床和实验环境中的疼痛。个体在分散注意力引起的镇痛程度上存在差异,需要进一步研究以确定影响分散注意力镇痛效果的因素。灾难化是一组消极的情绪和认知过程,广泛认为与增加疼痛报告有关。我们试图评估灾难化与分散注意力镇痛之间的关系。健康参与者以随机顺序完成了三个会话。在一个会话(仅疼痛)中,通过局部应用 10%辣椒素乳膏和同时给予紧张热刺激来引起疼痛。在另一个会话(疼痛+分散注意力)中,遵循相同的辣椒素+热应用程序,但受试者玩需要高度注意力的视频游戏。在两个会话中,均获得口头疼痛评分,并让参与者评估其灾难化程度。在其他会话(仅分散注意力)中,受试者在没有任何疼痛刺激的情况下玩视频游戏。与“仅疼痛”会话相比,分散注意力会话中疼痛评分明显降低。此外,无论受试者是否分散注意力,高灾难化者的疼痛评分均明显较高。灾难化并未影响整体分散注意力镇痛程度;然而,在会话早期,高灾难化者的分散注意力镇痛效果很小,而在会话后期,低和高灾难化者的疼痛评分相似。这些结果表明,分散注意力和灾难化都对正常受试者的实验性疼痛有很大影响,并且这些变量会随着时间的推移相互作用。