Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.
Neurosci Res. 2010 Jun;67(2):117-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2010.02.009. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
Although the rat has been the predominant rodent used to investigate the pathophysiology and treatment of experimental spinal cord injury (SCI), the increasing availability of transgenic animals has led to greater use of mouse models. However, behavioral assessment after SCI in mice has been less extensively investigated than in rats and few studies have critically examined the correlation between behavioral tests and injury severity or tissue damage. The present study characterized hindlimb functional performance in C57Bl/6 mice after contusion SCI at T9 using the weight drop method. A number of behavioral tests were examined with regard to variability, inter-rater reliability, and correlation to injury severity and white matter sparing. Mice were subjected to sham, mild-moderate or moderate-severe SCI and evaluated at day 1 and weekly up to 42 days using the Basso mouse scale (BMS), ladder climb, grid walk, inclined plane, plantar test and tail flick tests. The ladder climb and grid walk tests proved sub-optimal for use in mice, but modifications enhanced their predictive value with regard to injury severity. The inclined plane, plantar test and tail flick test showed far too much variability to have meaningful predictive value. The BMS score proved reliable, as previously reported, but a combined score (BLG) using BMS, Ladder climb (modified), and Grip walk (modified grid walk) provided better separation across injury levels and less variability than the individual tests. These data provide support for use of a combined scoring method to follow motor recovery in mice after contusion SCI.
尽管大鼠一直是用于研究实验性脊髓损伤 (SCI) 的病理生理学和治疗的主要啮齿动物,但随着转基因动物的日益普及,小鼠模型的使用也越来越多。然而,SCI 后小鼠的行为评估不如大鼠广泛,并且很少有研究批判性地检查行为测试与损伤严重程度或组织损伤之间的相关性。本研究使用重物坠落法在 T9 处对 C57Bl/6 小鼠的挫伤性 SCI 后后肢功能进行了特征描述。对许多行为测试进行了检查,包括变异性、评分者间可靠性以及与损伤严重程度和白质保留的相关性。将小鼠分为假手术组、轻度中度组或中度重度组,并在第 1 天和每周评估 42 天,使用 Basso 小鼠量表 (BMS)、梯级攀爬、网格行走、斜面、足底测试和尾巴拍打测试。梯级攀爬和网格行走测试对小鼠的使用效果不佳,但改进后提高了其对损伤严重程度的预测价值。斜面、足底测试和尾巴拍打测试的变异性太大,没有有意义的预测价值。正如之前报道的那样,BMS 评分可靠,但使用 BMS、梯级攀爬(改良)和握力行走(改良网格行走)的综合评分 (BLG) 比单独的测试提供了更好的损伤水平分离度和更小的变异性。这些数据为在 SCI 后使用联合评分方法来监测小鼠的运动恢复提供了支持。